Re: Runner

1

wow. that is freaking fast.


Posted by: will | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 3:14 PM
horizontal rule
2

Juiced.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 3:16 PM
horizontal rule
3

But how big, how skinny is he? Why do you omit the most important details?


Posted by: I don't pay | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 3:17 PM
horizontal rule
4

Jesus Christ, that's fucking fast. I am in awe.


Posted by: A White Bear | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 3:19 PM
horizontal rule
5

It's running an 18 second 100 meters (and that's faster than you think) four hundred and twenty one times in a row.

This, I admit, is a good way to convey the impressiveness of the feat. I'd bet that if you're not particularly fast (I'm not), it would take you around 14 or 15 seconds to run a 100 meters one time. That's unreal.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 3:19 PM
horizontal rule
6

My pace bicycling is generally 10 MPH.


Posted by: rob helpy-chalk | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 3:21 PM
horizontal rule
7

It was within the lifetime of some of us that one four minute mile was considered impossible, let alone twenty six in a row. (I know, this was closer to twenty six five minute miles, but still).


Posted by: tassled loafered leech | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 3:21 PM
horizontal rule
8

Whoa. His splits are 10 seconds faster than my best mile time. That's insane.


Posted by: Matt F | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 3:22 PM
horizontal rule
9

Remember Gladwell's description of Bannister training on lunch breaks, and what a different world that was?

Didn't realize TLL was another of us.


Posted by: I don't pay | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 3:23 PM
horizontal rule
10

Jesus H.

Btw, I get the impression that practically all the men in Ethiopia are named some variant of Haile Selassie.


Posted by: cerebrocrat | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 3:24 PM
horizontal rule
11

IDP, he's about 5'5" and 124lbs.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 3:25 PM
horizontal rule
12

It turns out that world-class athletes are a shitload more athletic than us hacks. Also, rich people have a lot more money.

Now get back to work.


Posted by: Not Prince Hamlet | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 3:25 PM
horizontal rule
13

He is 34. No 34 yr old drops that much time without being on steroids! Have you seen how big his head has gotten?


Posted by: will | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 3:28 PM
horizontal rule
14

Unprovoked Prufrock references are banned!

There's debate about this (incl. on this blog), but I'm of the opinion that assuming his run was on a grade which averaged out to flat you'd also need to be at at least a 1.0% incline on a treadmill.


Posted by: washerdreyer | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 3:29 PM
horizontal rule
15

Who runs on a fucking treadmill anyway? The purpose of going for a run is to get outside for a while.


Posted by: Not Prince Hamlet | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 3:31 PM
horizontal rule
16

get on a treadmill, set it to the highest speed it will go, which is usually 10mph, and think about doing that for two hours. Now consider that you're still going almost three miles per hour (30% !) slower than Gebreselassie's 12.7mph pace

And the treadmill is doing some of the work, of course.


Posted by: I don't pay | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 3:31 PM
horizontal rule
17

Nah, the purpose of going for a run is to collect data.


Posted by: TJ | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 3:31 PM
horizontal rule
18

And the treadmill is doing some of the work, of course.

Don't make me stop this blog and come back there.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 3:33 PM
horizontal rule
19

16: There was a long argument about that awhile back, and LB and I both agreed that that's not true. I forget who was on the other side. Heebie, others?


Posted by: pdf23ds | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 3:34 PM
horizontal rule
20

If I trained really hard I could probably hold that pace for a 400. Maybe even an 800. On a track, like God intended.


Posted by: Not Prince Hamlet | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 3:35 PM
horizontal rule
21

Was I unclear that I was trying to pick this fight in 14?


Posted by: washerdreyer | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 3:36 PM
horizontal rule
22

Too subtle, w/d.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 3:37 PM
horizontal rule
23

Now w/d's probably right that you need an incline to make it as hard to run 10 mph over the ground as on a treadmill, based on the lack of a headwind. But the treadmill isn't doing the work.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 3:37 PM
horizontal rule
24

My last crossed with 21: See, if you're trying to pick a fight, you have to manage to actually be wrong.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 3:38 PM
horizontal rule
25

Who runs on a fucking treadmill anyway?

Um, people who live in climates where it's regularly, like, 20 degrees in the morning for 5 months of the year?


Posted by: m. leblanc | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 3:40 PM
horizontal rule
26

Warning: It's the first of the month and I'm entering my time. This renders me hostile and easily baited. The combination of tedium and self-loathing is a bad one.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 3:42 PM
horizontal rule
27

Besides, you don't have this neato console controlling everything and constantly giving you feedback, if you run on a trail or the street.

Probably.


Posted by: TJ | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 3:43 PM
horizontal rule
28

That's what God made all those cool high-tech outdoor fabrics for, so you don't have to run in a damp cotton sweatshirt with a layer of snow in your leg hairs any more.


Posted by: Not Prince Hamlet | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 3:43 PM
horizontal rule
29

I left out guilt and fear (over having kept lousy records of what I was actually doing all month, and worrying about getting busted for reconstructing my time inaccurately from memory.)


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 3:43 PM
horizontal rule
30

You're smart and beautiful, LB.


Posted by: Not Prince Hamlet | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 3:45 PM
horizontal rule
31

26: That should probably be on the Unfogged Google calendar.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 3:46 PM
horizontal rule
32

You're smart and beautiful, LB.

That and 2100 hours will get me a bonus. Or, rather, won't.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 3:47 PM
horizontal rule
33

31: Marked as "that time of the month."


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 3:47 PM
horizontal rule
34

That and 2100 hours will get me a bonus. Or, rather, won't.

That is a great month. Even the Carp would be proud.


Posted by: will | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 3:48 PM
horizontal rule
35

32: Doesn't matter. You have the respect and admiration of your imaginary friends, which is far more important in some abstract and impractical way. And lizards are much cooler than even the fastest rat.

(None of this shit ever helped me any, either. Fucking timesheets.)


Posted by: Not Prince Hamlet | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 3:51 PM
horizontal rule
36

Not that anyone cares that much, but there's a rivalry aspect to the record. The guy whose record Gebreselassie beat, Paul Tergat, is the same guy he outsprinted at the end of the Olympic 10k in both 1996 and 2000. They've both been running fast for a long time.


Posted by: eb | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 3:54 PM
horizontal rule
37

Not that anyone cares that much

My co-worker does; he knows all these guys and has me watching youtube videos of these races regularly. Some of them are really exciting.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 3:57 PM
horizontal rule
38

Bet that guy has some sore feet.


Posted by: TJ | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 3:57 PM
horizontal rule
39

33: Ha. That's how I read it first time through. Frightening that I didn't think to myself, "That's a weird thing to acknowledge on website."


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 4:00 PM
horizontal rule
40

39: Er, how else could it be read? That is to say, what is she talking about?


Posted by: Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 4:02 PM
horizontal rule
41

Some of them are really exciting.

More or less exciting than the swimming video clips?


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 4:04 PM
horizontal rule
42

I'm sure I don't understand, JM.


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 4:06 PM
horizontal rule
43

My co-worker does

I meant anyone here; running posts seem to have less appeal than swimming posts.

he knows all these guys and has me watching youtube videos of these races regularly. Some of them are really exciting.

Thanks to the internet I was finally able to see the Atlanta 10k, after NBC's horrible coverage practically ignored it at the time.


Posted by: eb | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 4:06 PM
horizontal rule
44

40: On the first business day of the month, my employer requires that complete records for all the time I billed in the prior month have been entered. I find that an irksome and irritating task.

But when a woman talks about being consistently irritable on a monthly basis, that's not the explanation most people go for first.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 4:06 PM
horizontal rule
45

How did the Unfogged triathletes do this weekend?


Posted by: will | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 4:07 PM
horizontal rule
46

40: She's entering what amounts to a time card for work into (I assume) a computer.


Posted by: SomeCallMeTim | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 4:08 PM
horizontal rule
47

46 makes it sound so easy. It's not.


Posted by: Not Prince Hamlet | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 4:10 PM
horizontal rule
48

Did I mention it's in six-minute increments?


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 4:12 PM
horizontal rule
49

I see JM has proven my point.


Posted by: eb | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 4:12 PM
horizontal rule
50

Six-minute increments in which Haile Gebrselassie could run more than a mile.

Set world marathon record 2.1

Figures out to what, six or seven hundred bucks?


Posted by: Not Prince Hamlet | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 4:17 PM
horizontal rule
51

You know, I actually haven't got the foggiest what I'm billing out at these days. Somewhere in the 3-400 range I'd guess -- could be lower, probably not higher.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 4:18 PM
horizontal rule
52

In law firms, the really good marathoners finish in 12-14 hours.


Posted by: Not Prince Hamlet | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 4:21 PM
horizontal rule
53

What's all this about finishing?


Posted by: Trevor | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 4:40 PM
horizontal rule
54

51 -- Wait, 300-400 a month?


Posted by: jms | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 4:50 PM
horizontal rule
55

I think she means dollars an hour (for the firm's coffers, not her pockets).


Posted by: Trevor | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 4:52 PM
horizontal rule
56

No, I was talking about my hourly rate. I've billed three-hundred-hour months, but very few -- I do know people who do that often. I've never hit four.

My hours are very low compared to what they should be. While I spend a hellish amount of time at work, most of it is consumed by self-loathing and inability to focus.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 4:53 PM
horizontal rule
57

Yeah, Trevor got it.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 4:53 PM
horizontal rule
58

Oh, whew! Crisis re: professional adequacy averted.


Posted by: jms | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 4:54 PM
horizontal rule
59

In my firm, have to record all time for the month a full week before the month is over, for the convenience of the accounting department. (IANAL, by the way; we have merely adopted all the worst traits of that profession.)


Posted by: Knecht Ruprecht | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 4:55 PM
horizontal rule
60

See, it's not that other people are getting more done. It's just that when you're feeling self-loathing, and are nominally working on project/client X, you bill that self-loathing to X.

(My girlfriend used to be bothered by 6-minute billing in her government contracting job - you can spend that long going to the bathroom! Which project do you bill to? I pointed out that if you only had one project, you'd bill 8 hours a day to it, and not care how many times you went to the bathroom.)


Posted by: Nathan Williams | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 4:56 PM
horizontal rule
61

re: B/annister.

I taught him a few years back. He was attending some IT course that I was teaching. He was quite cool in a 'stalwart chap' sort of a way.


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 5:00 PM
horizontal rule
62

58: Heh. I've had that crisis a number of times, except it's been real. Workaholic friends are intimidating and make one feel small.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 5:03 PM
horizontal rule
63

He was attending some IT course that I was teaching

Pretty cool that he would do that. Isn't he a retired MD or somesuch?


Posted by: ogged | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 5:10 PM
horizontal rule
64

I knew someone who copied entire books - maybe only 1 or 2 - he got from a library by billing a few pages each day to the accounts for a couple of clients he really didn't like.


Posted by: eb | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 5:11 PM
horizontal rule
65

: 63

Yeah, he's a retired professor of neurology or something. The course was a sort of intro to IT course. There were a lot of retired or aging academics who attended it. One guy, I still love thinking about. He came with his daughter, who was of pensionable age herself. It took me hours to get him to use Word so he asked if, rather than continue the rest of the course, he could use the time to write something and I could check to see he was managing OK.

He told me he wanted to write his autobiography. The first line began, "I began work as a surgeon, in Sheffield, in 1929".

Turned out it was this guy and he must have been 97 or 98 at the time:

http://news.independent.co.uk/people/obituaries/article347582.ece

Amazing life. Great man.


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 5:18 PM
horizontal rule
66

Top Ten Reasons Not to Run Marathons


Posted by: James B. Shearer | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 5:46 PM
horizontal rule
67

51

What is the normal relationship between the bill rate and the pay rate? Is it different for associates and partners?


Posted by: James B. Shearer | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 5:51 PM
horizontal rule
68

eb, isn't that fraud?


Posted by: TJ | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 5:57 PM
horizontal rule
69

67: There isn't a fixed one -- I bill hourly, but I'm paid an annual salary. So the fewer hours I bill, the lower the ratio of bill/pay, the more hours the higher. Partner compensation is complicated -- I don't know how it works even here, and it's different firm to firm, but they're paid more than associates but don't consistently bill more hours. (Lots of them bill more hours than me, but not than associates generally.)


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 5:58 PM
horizontal rule
70

68: I assume so. I didn't say it was ethical, or something I approved of.


Posted by: eb | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 5:59 PM
horizontal rule
71

Yeah, he's a retired professor of neurology or something

Yes, neurologist; taught at Oxford, I think. My dad knew him professionally and spoke of him with great respect.


Posted by: Jesus McQueen | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 6:03 PM
horizontal rule
72

eb, I was just wondering. Plus, I like question marks.


Posted by: TJ | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 6:09 PM
horizontal rule
73

66--
four people in the boston marathon have died of brain cancer in the past ten years?
say it ain't so.
you know there are like something like 20,000 entrants every year?
and that brain cancer kills around 13,000 people nationwide every year?

the fact that four out of that 130,000 deaths in the last year happened to be among the 200,000 runners in the last ten years seems not so surprising.

dsquared can show up and put the detals on this point, but, honestly.


Posted by: kid bitzer | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 6:11 PM
horizontal rule
74

sorry--"130,000 deaths in the last "


Posted by: kid bitzer | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 6:12 PM
horizontal rule
75

and, "details".

detals, detals.


Posted by: kid bitzer | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 6:12 PM
horizontal rule
76

now i'm getting really narked:
74 should say "130,000 deaths in the last ten years",
only i put "ten years" in spitze klammern and it spits 'em out again.


Posted by: kid bitzer | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 6:16 PM
horizontal rule
77

eb, I was just wondering. Plus, I like question marks.

Oh, I didn't think you were being accusatory. I'm just covering in case I become a lawyer, or something.


Posted by: eb | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 6:19 PM
horizontal rule
78

Different sort of running, but WTF is wrong with Rudy G?


Posted by: Not Prince Hamlet | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 6:34 PM
horizontal rule
79

78: now there's a hole with no bottom.


Posted by: TJ | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 6:35 PM
horizontal rule
80

The man is a raving lunatic. The only reason he hasn't bitten the head off a bat on national TV is that it hasn't occured to him.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 6:36 PM
horizontal rule
81

79: Well said!


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 6:36 PM
horizontal rule
82

#66: Pritikin, Sheehy, Fixx, and Atkins, among many other originators of "healthy" practices died at comparatively young ages.

Is he talking about the Atkins diet guy, who died when he slipped on ice and hit his head on the pavement? Not really fair to link that to his diet plan.


Posted by: Gaijin Biker | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 6:36 PM
horizontal rule
83

Not mine, but can't remember where I heard it first.


Posted by: TJ | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 6:38 PM
horizontal rule
84

And Atkins was over seventy, at which point you're allowed to die without being second-guessed about it.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 6:39 PM
horizontal rule
85

To be fair, Art De Vany is pretty crazy.


Posted by: TJ | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 6:40 PM
horizontal rule
86

I'd really rather that Hillary and Rudy not win the respective nominations, but if they do we absolutely must have a debate between the prospective First Spouses.


Posted by: Not Prince Hamlet | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 6:41 PM
horizontal rule
87

69

Ok, so what is the normal range?

"... but they're paid more than associates but don't consistently bill more hours. ..."

But aren't their hours billed at a higher rate?


Posted by: James B. Shearer | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 6:41 PM
horizontal rule
88

79--
since lb applauds it, it must be funny.

wanna tell me what the joke is?


Posted by: kid bitzer | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 6:44 PM
horizontal rule
89

87: I'm not getting what you're asking. You want to know what a typical associate gets paid, how many hours they work, and what they're billed out at, and the same for a partner? There isn't a typical associate, and there really isn't a typical partner.

I could give you ballpark ranges for any one of those questions, but expressing it as a relationship between what you bill per hour and what you get paid per hour doesn't really make sense -- that's not how it varies.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 6:50 PM
horizontal rule
90

88: Not really a joke, it just seemed to perfectly express the vast, abysmal recesses of Rudy's craziness.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 6:50 PM
horizontal rule
91

But even knowing that the guy's a loon, it's hard to figure why he'd do something as bizarre and self-destructive as cooing at his wife on his cell phone while he's in the middle of a speech. I would have thought that pretending to give a shit about people who write checks to your campaign was covered in about the second lecture in Politician 101.


Posted by: Not Prince Hamlet | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 6:53 PM
horizontal rule
92

78 80

Guiliani may be crazy but this isn't really about him (except insomuch as the behavior of your spouse reflects on you). For more see this .


Posted by: James B. Shearer | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 6:56 PM
horizontal rule
93

But aren't their hours billed at a higher rate?

Yes, but that's not how they make their money. Indeed, a partner who billed too many hours at the expense of developing clients would be doing the firm a disservice. The real money comes from "leverage", that is, taking the margin between what LB bills out and what she makes in salary, less overheads, times a whole bunch of LB's. Marx called this the "rate of exploitation".


Posted by: Knecht Ruprecht | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 6:57 PM
horizontal rule
94

Partners generally bill out at a higher rate. But (traditionally) they're not employees who collect a salary, they're owners who take home a share of the firm's profits. How they divvy up the profits is up to them, using whatever arcane methods they can dream up. And remember, these are fancy lawyers. Plus, income can be expected to vary with whether the firm as a business has a good or bad year.

Complicating things, today you see more and more "tiered" partnerships, where there are lots of people walking around who are called "partner" but who are really glorified senior associates, such that they receive the majority of their compensation as salary, and then possibly get a small slice of the profits as a bonus. They may or may not get a say in how the firm is run (ie how that profit pie is divided), all subject to the terms of the fantastically complicated partnership agreement.


Posted by: Trevor | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 7:00 PM
horizontal rule
95

92: She can be as crazy as she likes, but he's the one who answered his cell during a speech. That's about him.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 7:00 PM
horizontal rule
96

It's a bit of a catch-22, isn't it? He can hardly divorce her.


Posted by: Merganser | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 7:04 PM
horizontal rule
97

89

I am looking for a reasonable rule of thumb for getting a ballpark estimate for how much a lawyer nets if I know what his time is billed at.

So to take a completely hypothetical example, if I know an associate bills at 300-400 $/hour what does that translate to in annual income?


Posted by: James B. Shearer | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 7:04 PM
horizontal rule
98

Oh man, I love it when they let the mask slip a little:

Judith is a liability and a half. She is vulgar, uneducated, grasping and insecure -- and has failed to keep those attributes hidden. She offends major donors right and left by being rude -- especially to their wives, especially the attractive wives.

Just not our kind of people. And, now that you mention it, isn't Rudy some kind of Eye-talian or something?


Posted by: Not Prince Hamlet | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 7:06 PM
horizontal rule
99

82 -- add Rodale and Adele Davis. Health kills!


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 7:07 PM
horizontal rule
100

I love it when they let the mask slip

There's a mask?


Posted by: slolernr | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 7:07 PM
horizontal rule
101

97: There is no such rule of thumb. Better to just look for information about what lawyers are getting paid in whatever area you're interested in.


Posted by: Not Prince Hamlet | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 7:08 PM
horizontal rule
102

There's a mask?

Eh, might be just Botox.


Posted by: Not Prince Hamlet | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 7:09 PM
horizontal rule
103

There's not really a god translation.

First of all, I think that associate billing rates raise significantly faster than salaries, which are artificially high for the quality of work that first-years do.

Second, and more importantly, some of the best-paid lawyers in a firm will be the ones who bring in a lot of business, and their pay can be a lot higher than their firm peers who bill actual piece work at the same rate. Broadly, billing rates should roughly track the value of the service performed for the client, while pay should track the value of the lawyer to the firm. Those do not always line up.


Posted by: Trevor | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 7:09 PM
horizontal rule
104

97: You can't get there from here. Billing rates will probably vary more from firm to firm than an associate's salary will -- I worked for a while at a smaller firm where I made maybe 75% of what a big-firm associate makes, but billed at about half of what I would have at a bigger firm, for example. Partner incomes are going to be wildly, crazily variable, and their billing rates have nothing to do with it.

If you want to know about how much a given lawyer makes, there are ways to figure it out, but working from their billing rate doesn't tell you anything outside the context of an associate in a specific firm or group of similar firms.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 7:12 PM
horizontal rule
105

97: from what I can tell, associates at big NY or SF firms make from $160k to maybe $250k per year. Bonuses for billing more hours than the minimum, which might be a little over 2000. Office space and (probably?) secretaries and support and such come out of the hourly billed to the client.


Posted by: Jake | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 7:12 PM
horizontal rule
106

First of all, I think that associate billing rates raise significantly faster than salaries, which are artificially high for the quality of work that first-years do.

For example, LB's assistant's billing rate is not $0/hr.


Posted by: Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 7:13 PM
horizontal rule
107

AFAIK, administrative staff is overhead, but work done by paralegals in frequently billed directly to the client.


Posted by: Trevor | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 7:15 PM
horizontal rule
108

*is* frequently billed


Posted by: Trevor | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 7:15 PM
horizontal rule
109

Paralegal work is pretty much always billed, secretarial work never. Oddly, they often do very similar tasks.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 7:16 PM
horizontal rule
110

103-107 are all completely correct, and yet...

..there are actually rules of thumb. A 5X or 5.5X target multiplier is not uncommon common. If you assume associate cash compensation (excl benefits) is 20% of associate billings at target utilitization, you will not lie far from the mark. Put another way: A billing rate of $400/hour equates to $160,000 in cash comp, a $650/hour bill rate equates to $260,000.

This is an aggregate picture, however, and you can't draw conclusions about individuals on this basis. YMMV.


Posted by: Knecht Ruprecht | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 7:28 PM
horizontal rule
111

110: Put another way: A billing rate of $400/hour equates to $160,000 in cash comp, a $650/hour bill rate equates to $260,000.

Those don't look wildly far off to me (say, within 30% or so, maybe?), if you limit them to associates in very big firms. Once you're talking about partners, or about lawyers in any other employment context, it's a whole other ballpark.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 7:35 PM
horizontal rule
112

It's running an 18 second 100 meters (and that's faster than you think) four hundred and twenty one times in a row.

It's running a mile in 4:45, 26 times in a row.

Or, it's like taking a single 3-foot stride in sixteen-hundredths of a second — 46,112 times.

Eh, wait, that one doesn't really work so well.


Posted by: Gaijin Biker | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 7:52 PM
horizontal rule
113

It's like driving twenty-six miles in first gear, with the parking brake on. Once.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 7:56 PM
horizontal rule
114

It's like falling in love, all over again, for the first time.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 7:59 PM
horizontal rule
115

Once you're talking about partners, or about lawyers in any other employment context, it's a whole other ballpark

Indeed. See 93 for partner comp. That's where the other 4X goes (less about 1.25-1.5X for rent, recruitment, unbillable time, and miscellaneous overheads).


Posted by: Knecht Ruprecht | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 8:02 PM
horizontal rule
116

It's like falling in love, all over again, for the first time.

No it isn't. Unless your first love was sort of a hopeless painful longing that went on and on and on and on and....

Yeah, maybe you've got a point.


Posted by: Not Prince Hamlet | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 8:02 PM
horizontal rule
117

It's like 10,000 spoons when all you've got is a knife, and that knife is relentlessly stabbing your lungs, feet and legs for two hours.


Posted by: Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 8:04 PM
horizontal rule
118

It's like turning up the rpm on a record until it sounds like Alvin & the other two and listening to it for two hours and four minutes while sitting in a bean-bag chair.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 8:06 PM
horizontal rule
119

A bean-bag chair filled with millipedes, you mean.


Posted by: Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 8:08 PM
horizontal rule
120

It's like the rotting of a turnip, the generation of an animal, and the structure of human thought.


Posted by: Merganser | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 8:09 PM
horizontal rule
121

Millipedes with rich, wonderful inner lives who speak in frequencies too high for our ears to hear so we just sit on them.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 8:10 PM
horizontal rule
122

It's like fighting off 421 five year olds, eighteen times in a row.


Posted by: Gonerill | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 8:10 PM
horizontal rule
123

It's like getting tenure.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 8:11 PM
horizontal rule
124

Everybody above is banned! Ogged for the post itself is banned!


Posted by: bob mcmanus | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 8:11 PM
horizontal rule
125

It's like running 312 miles in one day, but only 1/12 of that, and not quite as fast.


Posted by: Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 8:12 PM
horizontal rule
126

It's like violating the analogy ban every day for a decade.


Posted by: Merganser | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 8:12 PM
horizontal rule
127

It's like reading a 26,200-page book at 211 pages per minute, except the pages are asphalt and your eyeballs are feet.


Posted by: Gaijin Biker | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 8:13 PM
horizontal rule
128

It's like taking a decade's worth of analogy violations and spitting them all out in two hours.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 8:14 PM
horizontal rule
129

add Rodale and Adele Davis. Health kills!

And of course Herman Tarnower, who came up with a famous diet and then died of high-impact lead poisoning (granted, the causal relationship is a little convoluted in this case).


Posted by: Jesus McQueen | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 8:16 PM
horizontal rule
130

It's like listening to this for more consecutive hours than anyone ever imagined. And then scoffing at Paul Tergat.


Posted by: Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 8:16 PM
horizontal rule
131

It's like falling asleep with your face on the keyboard and waking up to a whole comment box full of k's and commas.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 8:16 PM
horizontal rule
132

It like running 260 miles, but only a tenth of that. So this guy is basically a pussy.


Posted by: Jesus McQueen | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 8:17 PM
horizontal rule
133

It's like posting #125, while Paul Tergat gets pwned by posting #132. But a lot more painful.


Posted by: Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 8:18 PM
horizontal rule
134

Jesus, quit being reasonable. Health kills!


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 8:18 PM
horizontal rule
135

It's like getting tenure

It's like getting tenure and then coming home to give the kid and baby their dinner and put them to bed because your goddamn already-tenured wife just breezed off to Europe and then you're there on the couch with your imaginary internet friends and a bottle of beer and that's why you went to grad school and slaved away all these years.


Posted by: Gonerill | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 8:19 PM
horizontal rule
136

It's like being your wife.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 8:20 PM
horizontal rule
137

HAPPY TENURE!


Posted by: redfoxtailshrub | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 8:20 PM
horizontal rule
138

135: And then doing the same thing, over and over again, for the rest of your life.


Posted by: Not Prince Hamlet | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 8:20 PM
horizontal rule
139

It's like 249.2 games worth of Rex Grossman's passing.


Posted by: TJ | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 8:20 PM
horizontal rule
140

It's like rusty nails in rotten wood and cryin' in the rain.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 8:21 PM
horizontal rule
141

And then doing the same thing, over and over again, for the rest of your life.

Hey, only 64 semesters to go!


Posted by: Gonerill | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 8:22 PM
horizontal rule
142

It's like taking the "bar" exam, under the neon light.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 8:22 PM
horizontal rule
143

133: Oh right. One should read the thread.


Posted by: Jesus McQueen | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 8:22 PM
horizontal rule
144

It's like Randy Moss being on track for 24 touchdowns in a season at halftime.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 8:22 PM
horizontal rule
145

It's like being a Mets fan, but with winning instead of losing.


Posted by: Jesus McQueen | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 8:23 PM
horizontal rule
146

It's like having 262 domesticated quail released within 50 feet of you, and shooting them all in only 2 minutes and 4 seconds.


Posted by: Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 8:23 PM
horizontal rule
147

It's like brushing your hair one hundred times every morning for maximum shine.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 8:24 PM
horizontal rule
148

It's like billing 80 hours/week at $400/hour for 4.326 weeks, if billable hours were feet.


Posted by: Merganser | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 8:24 PM
horizontal rule
149

it's like chewing each bite 5,280 times with false teeth.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 8:25 PM
horizontal rule
150

Cryptic Ned is commenting from an undisclosed location.


Posted by: Not Prince Hamlet | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 8:25 PM
horizontal rule
151

It's like a death row pardon two hours and four minutes too late.


Posted by: Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 8:25 PM
horizontal rule
152

It's like a decaf coffee enema.

Wait, no, it isn't.

It's like a skinny latte half-decaf coffee enema with sprinkles.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 8:26 PM
horizontal rule
153

It's like rubbing your ears off by accident doing the breaststroke.


Posted by: Gonerill | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 8:27 PM
horizontal rule
154

It's like falling asleep during oral sex and dreaming that you're swimming the channel.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 8:28 PM
horizontal rule
155

It's like "In-a-Gadda-da-Vida" and "Cat Scratch Fever" sung by angels.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 8:29 PM
horizontal rule
156

It's like taking the fall for your good buddy who got busted for drunk driving for the third time so you pretend that you were driving and you feel deep down like what you're doing is very, very wrong but you're pretty lit yourself.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 8:31 PM
horizontal rule
157

120 wins.


Posted by: ben w-lfs-n | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 8:33 PM
horizontal rule
158

It's like leaving the window open on those late-summer, early-autumn evenings when you think it'll be great sleeping weather, but in the morning all you have is that sniffle, and it was the freezing cold night that made you sick.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 8:36 PM
horizontal rule
159

It's like falling asleep during oral sex and dreaming that you're swimming the channel.

Yes, but not just any oral sex.


Posted by: Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 8:40 PM
horizontal rule
160

And isn't it ironic?


Posted by: Wrongshore | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 8:45 PM
horizontal rule
161

Heebie's in rare form tonight. And we even got a replay of one of her greatest hits.

Hey, I never understood the lawyer billing thing. Why can't you just fill in whatever? It's not like 2100 hours is that many hours to claim to have been in the office and working.

Before anyone gets huffy, I do realize that lawyers work a lot of hours, I just don't see why billing makes them do it.


Posted by: marcus | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 9:17 PM
horizontal rule
162

28 touchdowns a season.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 9:32 PM
horizontal rule
163

Lawyers practice what appears to outsiders as a highly specialized form of ethics.


Posted by: Trevor | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 9:33 PM
horizontal rule
164

I do realize that lawyers work a lot of hours, I just don't see why billing makes them do it.

The only hours the employer cares about are the ones for which the firm gets paid. If some lawyer doesn't bill enough to cover salary, overhead, and adequate profit, an employer might think putting someone else in that office would be a good idea. It's not very complicated.



Posted by: CharleyCarp | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 9:42 PM
horizontal rule
165

Thanks, marcus! It's like hoping your cats will end the stand-off and use the Citikitty toilet trainer because you're shocked that they've seemingly gone 24 hours with almost no number 1 or number 2. (One of each, total, for two cats.)


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 9:43 PM
horizontal rule
166

A friend just called to chastise me for not watching the NL wildcard playoff game, currently in the bottom of the 12th. Go Padres!


Posted by: Trevor | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 9:45 PM
horizontal rule
167

Now the imagined ordeals are getting less universal, more Heebie-specific.

164 is funny. It's like Charley is so ethical he can't imagine what I'm asking...let's make it clearer...why not just bill your Unfogged commenting time? What's to stop you? Is the evidence in the prodigious amount of work you do.


Posted by: marcus | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 9:47 PM
horizontal rule
168

It's like finding out that the "pork rinds" you've been munching on were made out of a guy you knew slightly and were intensely annoyed by.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 9:52 PM
horizontal rule
169

It's like making 26.2 of the wittiest comments anyone has ever seen, right in a row, with no break.


Posted by: marcus | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 9:54 PM
horizontal rule
170

It's like rain on your rival's wedding day.


Posted by: eb | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 9:55 PM
horizontal rule
171

HOME RUN!


Posted by: Trevor | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 9:56 PM
horizontal rule
172

167 -- A law degree costs a lot in time, money, and energy to obtain, and settling into a big firm even more. Risking it -- and someone caught cheating on time gets escorted from the building, we'll mail you your stuff -- to help the stats for one month or another is pretty shortsighted.

As well as being stealing.


Posted by: CharleyCarp | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 9:59 PM
horizontal rule
173

That's not to say that it wouldn't be a fine thing if Ungogged commenting was billable. You guys ready to take up a collection?


Posted by: CharleyCarp | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 10:02 PM
horizontal rule
174

Goddamn Rockies. 9-8.


Posted by: Trevor | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 10:18 PM
horizontal rule
175

Rockies didn't win it either.


Posted by: md 20/400 | Link to this comment | 10- 1-07 10:22 PM
horizontal rule
176

thank s


Posted by: seks shop | Link to this comment | 10- 2-07 8:13 AM
horizontal rule
177

45: The triathlon went really well. Didn't swallow much of the Potomac (and what I did swallow didn't taste any worse than other open water swims I've been in). Seeing as I haven't been training really hard, I was actually quite impressed with myself. Finished the swim in under 30 minutes, had a 22.3 mph average on the bike course, and ran 8 minute miles for the 10k run at the end. Felt great afterwards. I'll post more later.


Posted by: tweedledopey | Link to this comment | 10- 2-07 10:03 AM
horizontal rule
178

161: I think what you're missing is that you're not billing time to the law firm, your time is what determines the bill that gets sent to the client. It's not just numbers, it has explanations of what you were doing for that time, and the client is going to want those explanations to bear a reasonable relationship to useful work done that solved their problems.

It would be possible to fudge things some (I'm horrible about keeping contemporaneous records, so my time isn't as accurate as it should be. It's honest, on average, and where I'm not sure I lowball rather than highball, but I'm sure I've overcharged in some specific instances, and it's never come back at me), but not consistently, and not by all that much.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 10- 2-07 10:07 AM
horizontal rule
179

178

Is it really true that it would be hard to cheat materially? Suppose you can research and write briefs twice as fast as other lawyers at your level. Suppose you bill times consistent with what the average lawyer would take to do the work and spend your free time in the office but goofing off. It seems to me you that you would be unlikely to be caught.

And course you hear horror stories about clients who audit their bills and find lawyers charging 36 hours in a day and the like.


Posted by: James B. Shearer | Link to this comment | 10- 2-07 12:50 PM
horizontal rule
180

179: Oh, if you put some thought into it you could probably cheat materially along the lines you suggest, but the original question of 'why not just bill commenting time?' is that it would show up very obviously on the bill of someone who'd be interested in what they had been paying for.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 10- 2-07 1:02 PM
horizontal rule
181

Congrats Tweedle.

I agree with Charley. It is stealing.


Posted by: will | Link to this comment | 10- 2-07 1:05 PM
horizontal rule
182

Well, yes. Of course.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 10- 2-07 1:06 PM
horizontal rule
183

178: thanks, that makes it clear.

And of course I wasn't saying it was right. Just that I always found it weird that lawyers felt themselves under such massive pressure to clock utterly inhuman hours, while at the same time they had no monitoring devices like time clocks, etc. to enforce correct counts of the hours they were really working. This situation clashed with my understanding of human nature.


Posted by: marcus | Link to this comment | 10- 2-07 2:58 PM
horizontal rule
184

The lawyer's ethical code strictly forbids copping to overbilling. It's their equivalent of "don't snitch". Once in a very long while, perhaps when drunk in a secluded location, a lawyer might casually ask his best, oldest lawyer friend, "So, do you think maybe some people overbill in this profession? About how much on the average? So probably someone who overbilled a little less than that would be safe?" But the guy asked alwaysy underreports his overbilling.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 10- 2-07 8:30 PM
horizontal rule
185

will "LOL" get you banned around here? Thanks for adding that perspective, John.


Posted by: marcus | Link to this comment | 10- 2-07 9:23 PM
horizontal rule
186

The problem that people like LB have is that their consciences define one billable hour as the amount of work that they are capable of accomplishing in one hour when fully engaged and hitting on all cylinders. Since they only attain that level of productivity a smallish fraction of the time, accounting for the rest becomes quite painful.

People who define one billable hour as the amount of actual work that would be accomplished in one hour by the worst lawyer in the firm--or, in a slow month, the worst opposing counsel they've ever encountered--do not have this problem.


Posted by: Not Prince Hamlet | Link to this comment | 10- 2-07 9:34 PM
horizontal rule
187

See, that's marginalism. LB is a Marxist or Anabaptist or some weird ethical shit like that.


Posted by: John Emerson | Link to this comment | 10- 2-07 9:42 PM
horizontal rule
188

Butch Reformed. It's why she never gets catcalled.


Posted by: Cryptic Ned | Link to this comment | 10- 2-07 9:49 PM
horizontal rule
189

It's like driving a Honda Civic over 200 miles a day, every day, for 12 years.


Posted by: Gaijin Biker | Link to this comment | 10- 2-07 10:26 PM
horizontal rule