Re: The fish, the sea

1

It's been, like, two whole days since our one-month anniversary. And we've reached the stage in our relationship in which Rory is offering dissertation advice.


Posted by: Di Kotimy | Link to this comment | 01-30-11 9:06 PM
horizontal rule
2

How are people's dating lives going?

I would need to have a dating life to be able to answer this.

Anyone have a horror story or need a platform to complain?

Not only have I not got a dating life you have pushed my (admittedly trivial) post down!

Anyone have a dilemma that wants solved?

I really, really hope that your use of this idiom derives from time spent here; nothing—not even feminine attentions—could delight me more.

Feel free to happily note your one-month anniversary here, too.

Your first mensaversary?


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 01-30-11 9:07 PM
horizontal rule
3

Overfishing means our children's children won't know what the idiom alluded to in the post title means.


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 01-30-11 9:09 PM
horizontal rule
4

I really, really hope that your use of this idiom derives from time spent here; nothing--not even feminine attentions--could delight me more.

Consider yourself delighted.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 01-30-11 9:13 PM
horizontal rule
5

How delightful!


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 01-30-11 9:14 PM
horizontal rule
6

I might be involved in a relationship, and I've been delighting in not telling the internet too much about it, while dropping hints. In Wisconsin.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 01-30-11 9:15 PM
horizontal rule
7

Neb needed delighted.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 01-30-11 9:15 PM
horizontal rule
8

6: For one month and two days?


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 01-30-11 9:16 PM
horizontal rule
9

Your first mensaversary?

The bf was complaining recently about the inappropriateness of using anniversary to refer to units of time less than a year. He has also ranted about misuse of the subjunctive and other grammatical abuses. From time to time, I wonder if I'm really dating nosflow and just don't know it.


Posted by: Di Kotimy | Link to this comment | 01-30-11 9:20 PM
horizontal rule
10

Methods of dating lives are usually pretty straightforward, the most common one being using the birthdate.


Posted by: fake accent | Link to this comment | 01-30-11 9:21 PM
horizontal rule
11

Punctiliousness in language is the mark of a quality man.


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 01-30-11 9:23 PM
horizontal rule
12

10: I find that if you're doing serious work that method leads to results that are too open-ended to be of use.


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 01-30-11 9:24 PM
horizontal rule
13

I have a carbon-dating life.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 01-30-11 9:25 PM
horizontal rule
14

13: Half of one, anyway.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 01-30-11 9:28 PM
horizontal rule
15

I'm not dating anyone. Laydeez.


Posted by: Jesus McQueen | Link to this comment | 01-30-11 9:34 PM
horizontal rule
16

6: For one month and two days?

Nope. But Di Kotimy and I might hang out soon with our respective SOs. Speculate on.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 01-30-11 9:38 PM
horizontal rule
17

It's Rory!


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 01-30-11 9:38 PM
horizontal rule
18

Or maybe you meant "SOs, [which stands for] Speculate On."


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 01-30-11 9:39 PM
horizontal rule
19

||
Is it possible to sign on to facebook invisibly, as it were, so friends can't engage you in chat?
|>


Posted by: Jesus McQueen | Link to this comment | 01-30-11 9:47 PM
horizontal rule
20

19: You can turn chat off. I usually do.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 01-30-11 9:48 PM
horizontal rule
21

Nothing to report here, although there are some possibilities that I should probably pursue, since I'm probably only going to be here for a few more months and may well be somewhere with much more limited prospects thereafter.


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 01-30-11 9:49 PM
horizontal rule
22

Yeah, I stay invisible on facebook, too. I used to get these chirpy messages from students. Why the hell do they think it's fun to make small talk with your professor?


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 01-30-11 9:50 PM
horizontal rule
23

The "Options" menu on the little chat thing in the bottom-right corner has an option to "go offline."


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 01-30-11 9:51 PM
horizontal rule
24

Shows you how little I know about using fb. But great, thanks.


Posted by: Jesus McQueen | Link to this comment | 01-30-11 9:51 PM
horizontal rule
25

17: It took me a few seconds to reassure myself that Stanley is, in fact, closer in age to me than to Rory. I'm pretty sure, anyway.


Posted by: Di Kotimy | Link to this comment | 01-30-11 9:54 PM
horizontal rule
26

22: Weird. I can't really fathom doing that. But kids, lawn, whatever.


Posted by: Jesus McQueen | Link to this comment | 01-30-11 9:56 PM
horizontal rule
27

I thnk my attempts to not coquette at dances while my other half is out of town are giving the impression that I'm gay. As I don't think the gay women involved are getting that impression, and they're fine dancers, this is not likely to lead to comic misunderstandings, but it's all I have for the thread.


Posted by: clew | Link to this comment | 01-30-11 10:00 PM
horizontal rule
28

Responsive to the topic: OkCupid worked. Kinda sorta, but it worked.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 01-30-11 10:09 PM
horizontal rule
29

Perhaps you could save us the trouble of speculating, Stanley.


Posted by: Jesus McQueen | Link to this comment | 01-30-11 10:12 PM
horizontal rule
30

Perhaps he could, but where's the fun in that?


Posted by: teofilo | Link to this comment | 01-30-11 10:13 PM
horizontal rule
31

Stanley, we already know about the coffee pot, the two mugs, the ponies, and the vanilla ice cream! Have you been hiding something else?


Posted by: parsimon | Link to this comment | 01-30-11 10:14 PM
horizontal rule
32

We could play 20 questions! I'll start. Is it a woman?


Posted by: Di Kotimy | Link to this comment | 01-30-11 10:15 PM
horizontal rule
33

32: Define your terms.


Posted by: Jesus McQueen | Link to this comment | 01-30-11 10:17 PM
horizontal rule
34

33: It depends what the meaning of "is" is?


Posted by: Di Kotimy | Link to this comment | 01-30-11 10:19 PM
horizontal rule
35

I was thinking in terms of age, tbh.


Posted by: Jesus McQueen | Link to this comment | 01-30-11 10:21 PM
horizontal rule
36

Female of legal drinking age or older?


Posted by: Di Kotimy | Link to this comment | 01-30-11 10:23 PM
horizontal rule
37

Half plus seven would put her above legal drinking age, wouldn't it? That works for me. Next question!


Posted by: Jesus McQueen | Link to this comment | 01-30-11 10:26 PM
horizontal rule
38

My theory: Stanley is dating a pony.


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 01-30-11 10:37 PM
horizontal rule
39

I'm trying to work up the enthusiasm for dating again; last year was fruitful in that regard, so I'm not really sure where the reluctance comes from.


Posted by: Josh | Link to this comment | 01-30-11 10:42 PM
horizontal rule
40

All kidding aside, congratulations, Stanley.


Posted by: parsimon | Link to this comment | 01-30-11 10:53 PM
horizontal rule
41

My theory: Stanley is dating a pony.

"Up to 14.2 hands at the withers" sounds salacious.


Posted by: Jesus McQueen | Link to this comment | 01-30-11 10:53 PM
horizontal rule
42

I will have you know that I had an awfully nice dating experience which even lasted two months. But that's all over now, and who knows when I'll manage it again.

28- OKCupid worked
Note to self: if you ever go back on OKCupid, pun more.


Posted by: persistently visible | Link to this comment | 01-30-11 10:53 PM
horizontal rule
43

I think OkCupid would work for me if I lived in New York. Or, you know, rearranged my life sufficiently that being there often enough to date was not problematic.


Posted by: essear | Link to this comment | 01-30-11 11:36 PM
horizontal rule
44

I'm glad, Heebie, that you posted this just as the Valentine's Day onslaught is gaining force.


Posted by: Parenthetical | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:11 AM
horizontal rule
45

(Hm, I just read the other thread and am now worried that 44 sounds like griping about the post rather than very brief good-natured bitterness. It's the latter, not the former, trust me.)


Posted by: Parenthetical | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:21 AM
horizontal rule
46

Valentine's schmalentines. A student group I'm in is doing a Valentine's themed, pre-Valentine's day fundraiser. I don't really want much part of it, for various reasons, so it's good that I have a scheduling conflict.


Posted by: fake accent | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:25 AM
horizontal rule
47

Spent basically all of last year in my first post-separation relationship. It was nice for a few months then it was progressively more miserable and I kept trying to band-aid it when I should have gotten out of it. She finally broke up with me at the end of November ("I think we should take the labels off our relationship." "Would we still do X?" "No." "Y?" "No." "Z?" "Probably not." "Cuddle and watch TV together?" "Yes. So really it'll be like what our relationship is now.") Then she stopped communicating with me for a month.

I went on one OkCupid date; there was no chemistry. Then I went on a coffee date with someone I was acquainted with. Coffee date girl friend-zoned me, but very kindly instigated flirtation between me and another girl, which rapidly turned into serious sparks and ohmygod I haven't felt this way about someone since the 1990s. Serious cartoon hearts drifting around my head, here, people.

The only down side is that last year's ex runs in the same social circle and either really really wants to be friends with both me and the new girl, or really really wants to sabotage it, and we can't figure out which.


Posted by: Hamilton-Lovecraft | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:46 AM
horizontal rule
48

I used to think it'd be really fun to date someone completely different from myself. Turns out most people don't feel that way, plus it's really hard.


Posted by: YK | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:58 AM
horizontal rule
49

Are you still poly, HL?

I had a girlfriend when I was in college who broke up with me after a month or two, but would whenever it would look like I would start seeing someone else, would announce we should get back together. At some point I started avoiding her altogether.


Posted by: Walt Someguy | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 1:11 AM
horizontal rule
50

49: Poly depending on your definitions. I only want one "real relationship" at a time (though that's not a hard rule), but I want to know that I can flirt with and smooch other people, and that sleeping with other people occasionally is not out of the question, and that my partner is pleased, rather than threatened, by this stance.


Posted by: Hamilton-Lovecraft | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 1:35 AM
horizontal rule
51

God, I haven't dated on purpose in forever. I keep trying to think back on what it was, exactly, about my last earnest attempts that make it pretty much impossible for me to make another effort, and it's somewhere between (1) violent attempted rape by a crazy person and (2) the most boring and conversationally lazy person I've ever met in my life trying to score after a lunch date. Really, I go back and forth trying to figure out which one nailed the lid on the coffin of my desire to meet strangers. When I was a much younger woman, dates were often horrible in the rapey/molesty "but I paid for your dinner!" way, but now they also think I'm their therapist, professor, and mom as well.


Posted by: AWB | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 3:13 AM
horizontal rule
52

Seen elsewhere: "My dating life is complex. By which I mean 'partly imaginary'."


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 3:16 AM
horizontal rule
53

In my limited experience, dating by accident is more productive than dating on purpose, on balance. I suppose because nobody feels so pressured, artifical or just plain silly. The trick is, though, to be in a situation where it happens, and this is easier said than done.


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 3:26 AM
horizontal rule
54

||

NMM: The Marvelettes.

|>


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 3:40 AM
horizontal rule
55

53: Yes, but that would mean meeting people in real life who are attracted to me but are not my immediate coworkers, which pretty much means married people and drug addicts, and I'm rather weary of both.


Posted by: AWB | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 4:56 AM
horizontal rule
56

An attractive woman danced with me for a few hours when I showed up alone to a discotheque on Saturday, and gave me her number afterwards. After initially saying she'd meet me at a Brahms concert the next day (yes, I know, too soon) she backed out, citing too much stuff to do. I suppose I could invite her to the couchsurfers' boardgaming night I've organized. I dunno.


Posted by: x.trapnel | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 4:59 AM
horizontal rule
57

55: There's always meeting your HS sweetheart for dinner/drinks to catch up.


Posted by: Di Kotimy | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 5:05 AM
horizontal rule
58

56. Why not? What have you got to lose?

55. Understandable. Perhaps you should find a couchsurfers boardgaming circle.


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 5:07 AM
horizontal rule
59

56. Why not? What have you got to lose?

Well, it just seems to be mixing things. There'll be plenty of meeting new people & socializing at the gaming night, anyway. Also, she said her English wasn't that great, and I expect the gaming will be mostly in English.

There're lots of classical music concerts in the area, so I could stick with that plan. I'd been meaning to attend more of them, but it's hard to motivate myself to do it alone.


Posted by: x.trapnel | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 5:20 AM
horizontal rule
60

My theory: Stanley is dating a pony.

I suspect not, but I *do* suspect that he is dating a "horse person".


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 5:56 AM
horizontal rule
61

There're lots of classical music concerts in the area, so I could stick with that plan.

There's a German movie, I can't remember the title, where a guy has a technique for picking up girls at classical concerts. He always buys two tickets, then goes to the concert venue and checks out the people holding "Brauche Karte" ("need ticket") signs out front. When he finds a sufficiently attractive one, he offers her the ticket at a bargain price.

That might work, but you'd have to try to find one too young to have seen the movie.


Posted by: Knecht Ruprecht | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 6:07 AM
horizontal rule
62

60: My secret is out. I'm dating a centaur.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 6:14 AM
horizontal rule
63

Rah and I will have our 9th anniversary in a few months and I am still embarrassed that I can't remember on what day we had our first date.

My sister, who unceremoniously dumped her husband in November, swore off men and then immediately got a boyfriend, has just been dumped unceremoniously by her boyfriend. I'd like to kick him squah in the nuts, but that wouldn't be helping.


Posted by: Robust McManlyPants | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 6:19 AM
horizontal rule
64

61:I think the pet shop owner does that in Exotica


Posted by: bob mcmanus | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 6:28 AM
horizontal rule
65

That might work, but you'd have to try to find one too young to have seen the movie.

I wasn't planning on attending any concerts fancy enough to sell out, but that's worth keeping in mind. I tried doing that--well, mediated by Craigslist--back in October with a different sort of concert, which didn't work, but it turned out okay in the end anyway.


Posted by: x.trapnel | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 6:28 AM
horizontal rule
66

I'd like to kick him squah in the nuts, but that wouldn't be helping.

Don't see why not. If he's already dumped her she doesn't need his nuts to be in working order.


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 6:31 AM
horizontal rule
67

63: Maybe it would have worked better if she'd had a ceremonial divorce.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 6:45 AM
horizontal rule
68

21: Prospects always appear when departure is imminent. This is known as "expiration dating." I want to attribute this to Douglas Coupland but actually no I think that's wrong.


Posted by: Mister Smearcase | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 6:56 AM
horizontal rule
69

BR and I went out on our first date 7 years ago on either Feb 1 or 2.


Posted by: will | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 7:03 AM
horizontal rule
70

Jammies and I first hooked up 5 years ago on Feb 3.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 7:07 AM
horizontal rule
71

My wife and I got married the day after the 2nd anniversary of our meeting. That wasn't really intentional, either. It just happened that way.


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 7:10 AM
horizontal rule
72

BR first grabbed Heebie's butt 3 years ago.


Posted by: will | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 7:14 AM
horizontal rule
73

Also, the mouse is gone! Hooray maintenance department!


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 7:15 AM
horizontal rule
74

You had a mouse in your butt?


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 7:20 AM
horizontal rule
75

73. They're quite good at hiding, you know. I'd keep the champagne on ice for a day or two.


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 7:21 AM
horizontal rule
76

More interestingly, you have a butt maintenance department?


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 7:21 AM
horizontal rule
77

Ice butt?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 7:21 AM
horizontal rule
78

I still love Jammies comment:
"I want her genes in my kids!"

I thought it was very sweet.


Posted by: will | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 7:27 AM
horizontal rule
79


Fleur and I will celebrate our duodecennial wedding anniversary this year. That's supposed to be the "silk" anniverary. The first gift I ever gave her was a pair of (very nice, fairly expensive) silk pajamas.


Posted by: Knecht Ruprecht | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 7:28 AM
horizontal rule
80

I'd like to take every one of you out on a date. My treat!


Posted by: Pauly Shore | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 7:28 AM
horizontal rule
81

79:

Did they have "PINK" or "Juicy" written across the backside?


Posted by: will | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 7:32 AM
horizontal rule
82

My butt maintenance department has been majorly AWOL. They must hate mommy-blogging.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 7:35 AM
horizontal rule
83

I am sticking to my position that no woman worth having, or wanting, wants an unemployed misanthrope.


Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 7:40 AM
horizontal rule
84

The ex who was the original reason I de-lurked has just...ugh.

Long and short of it: we got back together, I eventually broke up w her for treating me like crap, she begged a second chance, and then just backed off in a wussy way after dragging it out for a month. I am more than a little annoyed with myself for giving her another chance to be an asshole. And also, she chose "asshole." She was so close to not choosing asshole.

And now I wanna move on. Not sport fucking or anything, I just...want to get on with my life.


Posted by: donaquixote | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 7:42 AM
horizontal rule
85

Oh, and on the subject of anniversaries, it is now nearly a month after the 3-year anniversary of my divorce. Which, really, people should celebrate these things.


Posted by: Di Kotimy | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 7:43 AM
horizontal rule
86

83: Shouldn't that be signed Groucho Marx?


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 7:43 AM
horizontal rule
87

86: I oppose Marxism and low-hanging fruit.


Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 7:44 AM
horizontal rule
88

Which is another drawback in the dating arena.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 7:45 AM
horizontal rule
89

You know, DQ, Will has been waiting ages for live-blogging of your moving on adventures. You sound like you are in a good place. Onward and upward!


Posted by: Di Kotimy | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 7:47 AM
horizontal rule
90

She was so close to not choosing asshole.

Sounds like an issue for the butt maintenance department.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 7:48 AM
horizontal rule
91

Or I could have said something supportive.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 7:49 AM
horizontal rule
92

And also, she chose "asshole."

To be fair, those Butt Maintenance Department positions do offer excellent benefits and only open up on rare occasions.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 7:50 AM
horizontal rule
93

Pwn Maintenance Department! Clean up on aisle 92!


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 7:51 AM
horizontal rule
94

86. Karl was the unemployed misanthrope. Groucho was the misanthrope who was turning away work.


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 7:52 AM
horizontal rule
95

Sounds like the Butt Maintenance Department has a major crack running through it.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 7:52 AM
horizontal rule
96

I am sticking to my position that no woman worth having, or wanting, wants an unemployed misanthrope.

I'm pretty sure there is a "Modern Love" column that specifically disproves this. Then again, maybe the "worth having, or wanting" is doing the work in that sentence.


Posted by: Knecht Ruprecht | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 7:53 AM
horizontal rule
97

#83: does an unemployed misanthrope sit around waiting for the human race to do something truly worth hating? If so, you need to watch "America's Got Talent" or "The Ricky Gervais Show".


Posted by: dsquared | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 7:54 AM
horizontal rule
98

95: Nah, they're just being cheeky.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 7:54 AM
horizontal rule
99

92, 93: Don't worry. It is probably just your socialization showing.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 7:54 AM
horizontal rule
100

only open up on rare occasions.

The fruit, how low it hangs!


Posted by: Knecht Ruprecht | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 7:55 AM
horizontal rule
101

OH MY GOD! YOU GUYS ARE! THE! FUNNIEST!!!


Posted by: Pauly Shore | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 7:55 AM
horizontal rule
102

Seriously, I'm dying over here.


Posted by: Pauly Shore | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 7:56 AM
horizontal rule
103

83, 96: There's a fair chance that Leo wil be un- (or more likely, under-) employed for a while when he relocates to my part of town. Which may or may not prove Flip's point.


Posted by: Di Kotimy | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 7:57 AM
horizontal rule
104


Did they have "PINK" or "Juicy" written across the backside?

No. Some things are all the more true for being left unsaid.


Posted by: Knecht Ruprecht | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 7:57 AM
horizontal rule
105

96: A great deal of the work, yes.

97: In this respect I may be rare, or even unique, among half-educated Americans, but I decided rather a long time ago that I had seen, heard and read quite enough of Ricky Gervais. He and Kanye West have been sent to live on the same farm in the countryside of my attention.


Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 7:58 AM
horizontal rule
106

HA HA HA! I think I just peed a little!


Posted by: Pauly Shore | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 7:59 AM
horizontal rule
107

Cassidy has a pair of pink sweat pants (handed down from friends) that say ICKY across the back.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 7:59 AM
horizontal rule
108

Um, well, I mostly lurk here (my one moment of Unfogged fame was when LB called me a Marshall McLuhan Moment) but this thread could use some cheering up, and I got engaged this weekend. (Imagine a smiley face here, which I know is against Unfogged house style.)

And, since I know there are some Montanans that hang out here, my ring is a lovely sapphire from the Yogo Gulch mine. My Missoula-bred fiancé was over the moon when he found it.


Posted by: Roadrunner | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 8:00 AM
horizontal rule
109

Uh oh, not just pee! :(

I'll be back in a minute.


Posted by: Pauly Shore | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 8:00 AM
horizontal rule
110

Yay Roadrunner!


Posted by: Di Kotimy | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 8:03 AM
horizontal rule
111

Congratulations, Roadie!


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 8:04 AM
horizontal rule
112

Thanks! We've been together for 7 years, so it won't be a huge change in our lives, but I'm actually pretty excited about the whole thing.


Posted by: Roadrunner | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 8:08 AM
horizontal rule
113

Congrats, Roadrunner!

DQ: Getting out of a bad relationship is always a good idea. The new possibilities for you are endless! Plus, Di is correct; live-blog your new adventures.


Posted by: will | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 8:13 AM
horizontal rule
114

Congrats, Roadrunner and regards to Wile E.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 8:14 AM
horizontal rule
115

Congrats, Roadrunner and regards to Wile E.

Wait until you see the fireworks display at the wedding reception!


Posted by: Knecht Ruprecht | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 8:21 AM
horizontal rule
116

sorry donaquixote, that sucks. good luck in your future dating endeavors. and liveblog, for sure.


Posted by: alameida | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 8:21 AM
horizontal rule
117

Congrats!


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 8:22 AM
horizontal rule
118

De rigeur:

Mr. Coyote states that on occasions too numerous to list in this document he has suffered mishaps with explosives purchased of Defendant: the Acme "Little Giant" Firecracker, the Acme Self-Guided Aerial Bomb, etc. (For a full listing, see the Acme Mail Order Explosives Catalogue and attached deposition, entered in evidence as Exhibit C.) Indeed, it is safe to say that not once has an explosive purchased of Defendant by Mr. Coyote performed in an expected manner. To cite just one example: At the expense of much time and personal effort, Mr. Coyote constructed around the outer rim of a butte a wooden trough beginning at the top of the butte and spiralling downward around it to some few feet above a black X painted on the desert floor. The trough was designed in such a way that a spherical explosive of the type sold by Defendant would roll easily and swiftly down to the point of detonation indicated by the X. Mr. Coyote placed a generous pile of birdseed directly on the X, and then, carrying the spherical Acme Bomb (Catalog #78-832), climbed to the top of the butte. Mr. Coyote's prey, seeing the birdseed, approached, and Mr. Coyote proceeded to light the fuse. In an instant, the fuse burned down to the stem, causing the bomb to detonate.


Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 8:22 AM
horizontal rule
119

118: I love that thing so much, but you didn't quote the best bit:

Repetition of blows along a vertical axis produced a series of regular horizontal folds in Mr. Coyote's body tissues---a rare and painful condition which caused Mr. Coyote to expand upward and contract downward alternately as he walked, and to emit an off-key, accordionlike wheezing with every step. The distracting and embarassing nature of this symptom has been a major impediment to Mr. Coyote's pursuit of a normal social life.

Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 8:25 AM
horizontal rule
120

Yes, good luck to DQ. But don't rule out the sport-fucking! And count me as another vote for liveblogging, of course.


Posted by: x.trapnel | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 8:25 AM
horizontal rule
121


118: Mr. Coyote has overlooked this little thing called a Mandatory Arbitration Clause. Bwaaahaaahhaaa.


Posted by: OPINIONATED ACME LAWYERS | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 8:26 AM
horizontal rule
122

121: There is a compelling public interest in preventing the manufacture and sale of defective rocket skates, gentlemen. Do you really want to face a jury on this?


Posted by: OPINIONATED COYOTE AND RELATED CANIS-GENUS LAWYERS | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 8:28 AM
horizontal rule
123

What is "sport-fucking"? Is it the same thing as "hate-fucking"?


Posted by: Cryptic ned | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 8:32 AM
horizontal rule
124

Sport-fucking is to hate-fucking as sport fishing is to hate fishing.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 8:35 AM
horizontal rule
125

123: I recall both terms as artifacts of the obnoxiousness-as-charm sexual-anxiety-as-sexual-confidence '90s, so, probably.


Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 8:36 AM
horizontal rule
126

Sounds too expensive and requires too much equipment.


Posted by: Cryptic ned | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 8:36 AM
horizontal rule
127

I do hate fishing.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 8:37 AM
horizontal rule
128

122: Our client believes that its products are safe and effective when used as directed, and intends to defend this suit aggressively. The plaintiff would be well advised to consider the negative publicity that will result from courtroom exposure of his manifest culpability -- an uncharitable witness might say stupidity -- revealed in the course of these unfortunate events. We have literally hours of animated footage to enter as evidence to in support of this argument.


Posted by: OPINIONATED ACME LAWYERS | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 8:37 AM
horizontal rule
129

You guys are sweet. I think right at this particular moment I'm probably too bitter to interact much with other people. I tried that once, and I was, like, the nightmare date. But hopefully soon I will not be bitter! Perhaps I can liveblog a getting-over-it montage? Like a mix of cleaning out my closet, doing one armed pushups, and making spontaneous snow angels while laughing at the simple rediscovered joys of life? That kind of thing?

And yay for Roadrunner!


Posted by: donaquixote | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 8:38 AM
horizontal rule
130

I s'port fucking and fishing. (But not at the same time. You can get hooked.)


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 8:38 AM
horizontal rule
131

Like a mix of cleaning out my closet, doing one armed pushups, and making spontaneous snow angels while laughing at the simple rediscovered joys of life?

In retrospect, Jack Palance was a poor choice of lead for Eat, Pray, Love.


Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 8:39 AM
horizontal rule
132

131: I'd see that movie.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 8:41 AM
horizontal rule
133

129: Absolutely! Liveblog the progress from "that evil asshole destroyed me" to "I am better and stronger and happier than I've ever been and, God, am I grateful I didn't wind up with that asshole." That may include reorganized closets or gourmet meals or training to run a marathon.


Posted by: Di Kotimy | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 8:43 AM
horizontal rule
134

The distracting and embarassing nature of this symptom has been a major impediment to Mr. Coyote's pursuit of a normal social life.

Documents obtained through discovery will clearly prove that Mr. Coyote was and always has been a solitary outcast who has never known a normal social life. One might feel sorry for Mr. Coyote, but the reality is that he cannot prove damages.


Posted by: OPINIONATED ACME LAWYERS | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 8:43 AM
horizontal rule
135

DQ, if you're looking for a girlfriend, I'd be happy to send you mine, though that probably tells you how she's doing on the asshole metric. She's decided to start smoking again, and of course the best way to do that without bothering the asthmatic three-year-old is to jaunt off to a bar to hang with friends for an hour or two. It would be fine if we were alternating who got to take personal time, but Mara was with me everywhere except work and the grocery store last week, whereas Lee went out alone almost every day. She's acknowledging there's a problem and that she's going to work on it, but for a lot of reasons I want to just curl up in a ball and cry today.

Anyway, I don't have anything useful to ATM, so I'll just bask in other people's cute stories. And there are many here! Both condolences and best wishes to the people on the breakup side of things; I'm just focusing on the happier bits.


Posted by: Thorn | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 8:45 AM
horizontal rule
136

Stanley!


Posted by: donaquixote | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 8:46 AM
horizontal rule
137

134: On the contrary, gentlemen: Mr. Coyote is a certified and well-known SUPERGENIUS. His need for quiet and isolation in which to pursue the life of the mind is comparable to that of other brilliant canids, like Snoopy and Mr. Peabody.


Posted by: OPINIONATED COYOTE AND RELATED CANIS-GENUS LAWYERS | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 8:47 AM
horizontal rule
138

the best way to do that without bothering the asthmatic three-year-old is

...to just step outside on the porch to have a smoke.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 8:50 AM
horizontal rule
139

138: You win for the solution we've now agreed to! I can't believe it took as much work to get to consensus as it did, though. I am grumpy.


Posted by: Thorn | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 8:52 AM
horizontal rule
140

136: donaquixote!


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 8:52 AM
horizontal rule
141

132: I'd pre-order that movie, starring Zombie Jack Palance.

Thorn, I'm sorry. Does she / you / you as a couple have a plan for working on it? I get that maybe you don't want to go on about it, but I can readily see where that situation would suck for you big time, and my first instinct is try to be helpful if I can, even though I probably can't, and....that question about a plan is how that all came out. So, really, probably not that helpful. I hope she works on it soon.


Posted by: donaquixote | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 8:53 AM
horizontal rule
142

141: We're working on plans. We're going to start scheduling more time and making her actually stick to the schedules, since she has yet to cook a single meal after offering to take on both Wednesdays and Saturdays back in mid-December. (Oh, I'm lying; she made chili once, but it was while both Mara and I were out and only she ended up eating it, I think.) I'm just too tired to be making more demands and so I register my displeasure and she goes off and probably complains to people about what a buzzkill I am. We're both wiped out and not prioritizing properly.


Posted by: Thorn | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 8:57 AM
horizontal rule
143

when he relocates to my part of town

Doesn't he need to relocate to your part of the country first? Is that already in the works?


Posted by: Sir Kraab | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 8:57 AM
horizontal rule
144

129: My particular version of that montage had me buying an absurdly expensive but exquisitely engineered vacuum cleaner yesterday. It is fucking awesome! I Vacuumed All The Things!


Posted by: | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 9:00 AM
horizontal rule
145

What songs will play during your respective montages?


Posted by: Sir Kraab | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 9:01 AM
horizontal rule
146

144: Is it a Dyson? I recently got to use one, and it certainly does suck. Boy howdy.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 9:02 AM
horizontal rule
147

What songs will play during your respective montages?

Oh, you know, something sweet and sentimental.


Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 9:03 AM
horizontal rule
148

I wasn't planning on attending any concerts fancy enough to sell out

Lots of non-fancy concerts sell out. This concert sold out and you can be assured that there were plenty of attractive ladies who Karte brauchten.


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 9:04 AM
horizontal rule
149

Thorn, sorry you're getting the short end of the childcare stick. No wonder you're wiped out.


Posted by: Sir Kraab | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 9:04 AM
horizontal rule
150

I'll bet you're grumpy; I'd probably be teetering on the edge of violence.

We're both wiped out

I know this carries all the comfort of a wire monkey right now (and doesn't address the underlying problem at all), but it honestly does get easier after three. That age is more exhausting than a newborn.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 9:05 AM
horizontal rule
151

145: The first thing that came to mind was "Always Look on the Bright Side of Life", but I'm not committed to that. Doesn't quite have that power-you-through-a-snow-bank-while-inexplicably-carrying-firewood quality.


Posted by: donaquixote | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 9:07 AM
horizontal rule
152

147: I'd never heard of the show whence the clip, but it's worth watching to the end.

Also, from the comments:

kenny powers: there is no I in team, but there is a U in cunt.


Posted by: Sir Kraab | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 9:10 AM
horizontal rule
153

Last post comment before I go have lunch, but this has been a really rough week. Mara's test triggered a lot of anxiety and regression for her, mostly meaning she's been having hysterical screaming fits toward me and me alone. So she'll hold me as tight as she can while screaming NO, GO AWAY and kicking and writhing. She also wasn't sleeping well, which means neither was I. And she needed to be with me, held, whatever at all times, which has not been the case so much recently. It was like having a three-year-old and a baby at the same time, sometimes explicitly when she wanted to be rocked and swaddled and say googoogagaga.

So yes, I'm extra bitter because Lee can sleep through things I can't and because she was drinking her second beer while I was plunging the toilet for the second time yesterday afternoon. But even though she's making decisions that look selfish to me, she's doing it to keep herself sane and able to do what she does for Mara, and I need to respect that intention at least and do what I can to do the same for myself. It's only been three months.

But I need to buy a new vacuum this week, so I'm grateful for that part of the thread too, though hoping someone will pop up and say Dysons are overrated and you should definitely just buy something cheaper.


Posted by: Thorn | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 9:10 AM
horizontal rule
154

143: While previewing, I reread comment #1, so I think I get it now. (When I first read it, I thought "dissertation" was a euphemism.)


Posted by: Sir Kraab | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 9:11 AM
horizontal rule
155

Doesn't quite have that power-you-through-a-snow-bank-while-inexplicably-carrying-firewoodice-cream quality.


Posted by: Sifu Tweety | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 9:12 AM
horizontal rule
156

Dysons should be free, man.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 9:12 AM
horizontal rule
157

Can I steal Flippanter's suggestion? I'm stealing Flippanter's thing.

Thorn, is it at all standard for new adoptive parents to get counseling? I only ask because it seems like adopting a toddler with a few special needs would normally be pretty stressful, and the nature of the undertaking wouldn't leave you with very much time or energy to deal with the changes it brings.

I really hope she comes around, and soon.


Posted by: donaquixote | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 9:12 AM
horizontal rule
158

because she was drinking her second beer while I was plunging the toilet for the second time yesterday afternoon

150.1! 150.1!

Seriously, if the kid wants to cling to you then that much may be unavoidable, but in that case Lee can really be doing the damn toilet plunging.


Posted by: urple | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 9:15 AM
horizontal rule
159

Sorry, that was inappropriate. I hope you two (/three) are able to resolve things.


Posted by: urple | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 9:16 AM
horizontal rule
160

I find it hard to believe Dysons are worth the price. Thorn, I'm sending you (nerd alert!) Consumer Reports info on vacuums.


Posted by: Sir Kraab | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 9:17 AM
horizontal rule
161

152, 157: One feels a certain ... kinship with Kenny Powers on occasion, usually when he is shouting apologetically:

"I'm Kenny Powers! I'm very upset with how I'm acting right now! I just have a very hard time expressing my emotions and I can't stop from yelling! So I'm very sorry! I'm just very upset right now. So I'm just gonna go ahead and go. But I'm not gonna stop yellin', cause that would mean I lost the fight! So please leave a key under the mat. I love you all very much. Peace out!"


Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 9:17 AM
horizontal rule
162

Karl was the unemployed misanthrope. Who got the aristocratic debutante queen. Extra fun trivia, his brother in law was in charge of crushing radical movement in the wake of 1848 as Prussian minister of the interior.


Posted by: teraz kurwa my | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 9:20 AM
horizontal rule
163

143: Yes, and yes.


Posted by: Di Kotimy | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 9:21 AM
horizontal rule
164


Karl was the unemployed misanthrope. Who got the aristocratic debutante queen.

He was sort of the Marty Peretz of his day.


Posted by: Knecht Ruprecht | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 9:22 AM
horizontal rule
165

Who got the aristocratic debutante queen.

And heretofore I was in such a good mood.


Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 9:24 AM
horizontal rule
166

I do like my Dyson. It's not magic, but it's less annoying than any other vacuum I've ever had, and it means that I vacuum a whole lot more. I'm kind of embarrassed about having paid that much for it, but other than the shame of overconsumption, I don't feel remotely cheated.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 9:25 AM
horizontal rule
167

163: Whooooooo hooooo!

164: He was gay?


Posted by: donaquixote | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 9:25 AM
horizontal rule
168

158: Yeah, I'm having a hard time thinking of something appropriately supportive to say that isn't inappropriately hostile about your partner.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 9:26 AM
horizontal rule
169

164: Except Karl's wife didn't have any money of her own, right? Weren't they always broke?


Posted by: peep | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 9:27 AM
horizontal rule
170


163: Another satisfied customer!


Posted by: Knecht Ruprecht | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 9:28 AM
horizontal rule
171

132: hmm, a film about a middle-aged man who dumps his boring middle-aged wife and goes off travelling around the world until he hooks up with a hot young foreign woman? I'm not sure that's going to work quite as well that way around.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 9:37 AM
horizontal rule
172

171: To be fair, and I hate myself for knowing this though I know not how it came to my attention, Ms. Gilbert's replacement husband is well into his late-middle years.


Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 9:40 AM
horizontal rule
173

Except Karl's wife didn't have any money of her own, right? Weren't they always broke?

Yup. Engels paid for them and their kid, by working for his daddy's firm. Which must have come hard because Engels was one of nature's DFHs. There's a story about some friend going round to his place and he (this mid Victorian bourgeois) was sitting on the floor with his collar undone, and his wife had her stays loose and the floor was littered with empty bottles, and Engels was just, "Whoa, yeah, great to see you man, get a drink""


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 9:41 AM
horizontal rule
174

kids


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 9:41 AM
horizontal rule
175

I appreciate 156 even if no one else does, and am now imagining what a Dyson vacuum cleaner designed by Freeman Dyson would be like. My imaginings are fuelled by just having read "Project Orion".

They really missed a trick by calling it the Dyson Ball rather than the Dyson Sphere.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 9:42 AM
horizontal rule
176

hoping someone will pop up and say Dysons are overrated

I could not be forced to pay that much for a vacuum cleaner if it were the only one left and the salesman had me at gunpoint. I have a Bissell that I bought a year or so ago and absolutely love.


Posted by: Robust McManlyPants | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 9:43 AM
horizontal rule
177

... a Dyson vacuum cleaner designed by Freeman Dyson.

A couple of astronomical units in diameter, at least, right?


Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 9:43 AM
horizontal rule
178

And probably involving a small and elegantly designed nuclear reactor.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 9:44 AM
horizontal rule
179

178: "Small but perfectly-formed, like Kylie Minogue...."


Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 9:47 AM
horizontal rule
180

172: only seen the trailer, I'm afraid; doesn't the Julia Roberts character end up with Javier Bardem?


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 9:47 AM
horizontal rule
181

176: In that case, be careful about the moving parts .


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 9:48 AM
horizontal rule
182

179: I like my women like I like my nuclear reactors. Small, elegant, extremely hot and with inherent stability built into the design.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 9:48 AM
horizontal rule
183

180: And then the captive-bolt scene?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 9:49 AM
horizontal rule
184

183: that would be a much better film, certainly.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 9:49 AM
horizontal rule
185

What do we think the odds are on my regretting the angry emails I sent the ex at 11:52 last night and 6:12 this morning? Sounds like they'll be pretty high, right? I re-read, and while pissed off, nothing in them was actually incorrect. Just awfully final, pissed, and judgy.

Now I have to drive up there and get my stuff again. Goddammit.


Posted by: donaquixote | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 9:53 AM
horizontal rule
186

I still have a few of my more rash, angry emails saved. The Fuck-You-[ex-best-friend's-husband] series remains, quite frankly, a favorite for which I have no regrets. YMMV.


Posted by: Di Kotimy | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 9:56 AM
horizontal rule
187

Now I have to drive up there and get my stuff again.

I'm not sure whether this more strongly indicts love or stuff, but it's a pretty familiar case either way.


Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 9:57 AM
horizontal rule
188

146: A Miele. German engineering FTW! It's absurdly powerful and about as noisy as the cooling fan on my refrigerator.

I have a cat that sheds enough to stuff a pillow about once a month. The damn thing would be a goldmine if there was a market for cat hair. As is he's simply turned my apartment into a vacuum cleaner torture test lab. Perhaps I could lease my place to consumer reports for their next round of vacuum cleaner testing.


Posted by: togolosh | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 9:57 AM
horizontal rule
189

We should have a "Best Nasty Email You Ever Sent" contest!


Posted by: will | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 9:57 AM
horizontal rule
190

185. Why would you regret them? Are you planning to get back together? Didn't think so. If you're at a loss what to do with the, post them here. Create the first 2000 comment thread!


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 9:58 AM
horizontal rule
191

188: have you tried the Furminator? It is awesome.


Posted by: k-sky | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 10:00 AM
horizontal rule
192

I like this idea. There could be several variations.

Post a circumstance and we write the email.

Post an email and we can make it nastier. Or maybe draft a follow-up email that explains why the first email was totally necessary, justified, and too mild.


Posted by: will | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 10:01 AM
horizontal rule
193

#182: I comiserate with you; presumably you always end up with women who are always late, demand far more money spent on them you can really afford, and regularly leak toxic discharges into the Irish Sea.


Posted by: dsquared | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 10:02 AM
horizontal rule
194

I have a cat that sheds enough to stuff a pillow about once a month. The damn thing would be a goldmine if there was a market for cat hair.

One of my cousins used to teach at a textile/fashion college, and one of her things was to gather unusual animal hair, or fibres and turn it into clothes. She had one of those medieval looking spinning wheels, the whole bit. I don't know if she ever did cat hair, but she certainly did dog hair, and other things.


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 10:03 AM
horizontal rule
195

185: No regrets, only something that will make a catchy end to this slogan! Truth hurts and whatnot.

Let's see, no, I would not buy a Dyson, though they're cute. If I were going to put that much money into a machine, I'd buy a dishwasher since that's what would save me more effort. But I do need to buy a little something that will gladly suck up dog hair.

And thanks, everyone. I feel better after venting and then eating lunch. Remembering to eat is important, it turns out! We're in counseling for Mara but haven't been seeing our couples' counselor or any of the individual counselors we used to see. I think couples' counseling will be the first back on the agenda. For now, at least Lee's listening and agrees that things aren't fair. I can work from that starting point, especially if I really do get a long hot bath and an early bedtime tonight as promised.


Posted by: Thorn | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 10:04 AM
horizontal rule
196

191: I think I shall buy that thing. I currently comb him daily with a wire bristle brush designed for the purpose, but I'm certainly interested in trying anything that's more efficient. Plus the name is awesome.


Posted by: togolosh | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 10:05 AM
horizontal rule
197

194: And here we have Sasha sporting the anaphylactic shock shawl. Just look at how it complements the puffy redness of her eyes!


Posted by: Di Kotimy | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 10:06 AM
horizontal rule
198

Miele FTW. In the vacuum cleaner subthread, that is; there's no winning with relationships. You can occasionally pick up a secondhand Miele for not too much on Craigslist. You can also pick up number of secondhand partners for nothing on Craigslist, but it'll only come to sorrow in the end, and the Miele does a better job on your carpets.


Posted by: Jesus McQueen | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 10:07 AM
horizontal rule
199

I like my women like I like my wind farms: unsightly, covered in dead birds and hanging around off the coast of Lincolnshire.


Posted by: dsquared | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 10:07 AM
horizontal rule
200

I wish. In fact I end up with unstable Ukrainian women who have spectacular breakdowns in public that I still haven't recovered from 20 years later.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 10:09 AM
horizontal rule
201

thinking about it, #199 s/b "environmentally responsible but too unreliable to be an exclusive solution".


Posted by: dsquared | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 10:10 AM
horizontal rule
202

194: One of my sisters spun yarn from the family dog's copious fur. Even after countless washings, it still smelled distinctly of dog.


Posted by: Jesus McQueen | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 10:10 AM
horizontal rule
203

199, 201: Can't get by without a few peakers, you know.


Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 10:11 AM
horizontal rule
204

I like my men like I like my state government: corrupt, bankrupt, and the subject of frequent federal indictments.


Posted by: Di Kotimy | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 10:12 AM
horizontal rule
205

Miele is the awesome. Not that I use it much, but on the rare occasions that I do vacuum it is very good. I got mine for $200, new, in a brick and mortar store. Not cheap but not crazy expensive either.


Posted by: teraz kurwa my | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 10:15 AM
horizontal rule
206

204. Can I send you my brother in law, then?


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 10:15 AM
horizontal rule
207

190: Well, part of me feels like it's not ok to beat up on her for being emotionally dysfunctional ("dysfunctional" was definitely not my original word choice there), because in the long run it's probably worse for her than it is for me. But then I remember that, wait, no, she's an adult. I dunno. I just think there's a possibility that when I care less I'm gonna regret saying hurtful things. Then I go back and think, "but they're true!" and the cycle begins again.

I mean, she didn't do a bunch of really messed up things on purpose, necessarily. She's just kind of a failure at feelings (and introspection!), and kind of selfish. (Weirdly, selfishness seems to be a family value. Wait: that's a red flag, isn't it?)


Posted by: donaquixote | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 10:15 AM
horizontal rule
208

Red flag posts are always fun. I'm sure I must be missing some, but I keep looking and can't seem to find them.


Posted by: Di Kotimy | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 10:17 AM
horizontal rule
209

I like my women the way I like my mainstream media: unreliable, obsessed with appearances, and inexplicably fond of John McCain.


Posted by: Annelid Gustator | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 10:19 AM
horizontal rule
210

Re: original post, my love life is going pretty well. This past weekend was the one-year anniversary of my first date with my girlfriend. That's kind of an arbitrary thing to celebrate because we had known each other for almost a year before dating and that first date was a very low-key thing, as she often makes fun of me for, but an anniversary is an anniversary, so we went out last night. And it actually didn't go all that great, but still, we've been living together happily for almost five months now, so we must be doing something right.


Posted by: Cyrus | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 10:23 AM
horizontal rule
211

when I care less I'm gonna regret saying hurtful things

Eh. That's what ugly breakups are for, dq. Just remember that private e-mails always have the potential to be seen by millions more eyes than originally intended. Therefore edit cycles for maximum wit and skewerage are recommended.

Anyhow, better to be angry than despondent. Take advantage of the energy it provides.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 10:23 AM
horizontal rule
212

Yay Cyrus!


Posted by: Di Kotimy | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 10:24 AM
horizontal rule
213

Yay Cyrus!


Posted by: Di Kotimy | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 10:24 AM
horizontal rule
214

I mean, she didn't do a bunch of really messed up things on purpose, necessarily.

Intentionality isn't all that, when it comes to relationship-sins. It might well be good for her to not get a free pass.


Posted by: x.trapnel | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 10:25 AM
horizontal rule
215

Be careful if you get the furminator, unless you like your cats like you like your women: nearly hairless and running resentfully from anything that could be used for grooming.


Posted by: Eggplant | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 10:26 AM
horizontal rule
216

I like my women the way I like my solar farms: quiet, clean, and bolted to concrete under the desert sun.


Posted by: Jesus McQueen | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 10:28 AM
horizontal rule
217

I like my women like I like my coffee: black, French and bitter.

212-213: Wow, that was extra enthusiastic.


Posted by: Cyrus | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 10:29 AM
horizontal rule
218

Intentionality isn't all that, when it comes to relationship-sins.

I agree with this.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 10:30 AM
horizontal rule
219

I think the only way to improve on the cat lady archetype is to add a habit of sending christmas sweaters made from the softest cat belly hair. Incidentally, I frequently tell one of my cats, "some one should make a coat out of you!" in a gooey voice.


Posted by: donaquixote | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 10:30 AM
horizontal rule
220

Mrs. Digest has just contributed "I like my men like my power grids - ideologically driven, not too smart and full of gas".


Posted by: dsquared | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 10:30 AM
horizontal rule
221

On review, 219 envisions a bleak future.


Posted by: donaquixote | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 10:31 AM
horizontal rule
222

217.2: I am just *that* happy for you.


Posted by: Di Kotimy | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 10:32 AM
horizontal rule
223


What, no love for coal-fired generators: cheap, a little dirty, and hard to shut down?


Posted by: Knecht Ruprecht | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 10:35 AM
horizontal rule
224

I like my women like I like my wind turbines - tall, powerful, and probably either Danish or German? With rivets and extremely big feet?

...like my concentrating solar power plants - hot enough to keep hundreds of tonnes of rock salt molten all night long, and Spanish?


Posted by: Alex | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 10:37 AM
horizontal rule
225

214, 218: Yeah, my response to "But I didn't intend to hurt you," was generally "Yeah, but did you make any deliberate effort to avoid hurting me?" Negligence is culpable, too.


Posted by: Di Kotimy | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 10:37 AM
horizontal rule
226

I like my women like I like my mid-winter snow packs? Cold, heavy, and with a non-zero potential for catastrophic damage.

(How's that for nasty? I did good, coach?)


Posted by: donaquixote | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 10:38 AM
horizontal rule
227

I like my women like I like my vessels: gendered female and encrusted with barnacles.


Posted by: k-sky | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 10:40 AM
horizontal rule
228

I like my women like I like my relationships: short, shallow, and shameless.


Posted by: Annelid Gustator | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 10:55 AM
horizontal rule
229

the link in 227 is a brilliant joke, right? The Seahawk photo in particular?


Posted by: donaquixote | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 10:59 AM
horizontal rule
230

I like my women the way I like my coffee: raised on South American plantations and shipped to my door when ready for use.

I'm pretty sure I've used that one, or one very like it, before. I omit but allude to the multiply-deployed talc one.


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 11:04 AM
horizontal rule
231

230: You have used something like that before, but the last time you used it, it was better.


Posted by: M/tch M/lls | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 11:16 AM
horizontal rule
232

229: I choose to believe.


Posted by: k-sky | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 11:34 AM
horizontal rule
233

I like my women like I like my seacaptains: on a boat, y'all.


Posted by: Annelid Gustator | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 11:36 AM
horizontal rule
234

||

I should have put up a post about this when it happened, not that I have anything useful to say about it. But I'm really depressed about Reid's failure to do anything about the filibuster. Fuckers.

|>


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 11:38 AM
horizontal rule
235

"My women" are not words that can seriously, or jokingly, pass my lips.


Posted by: bob mcmanus | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 11:40 AM
horizontal rule
236

They really missed a trick by calling it the Dyson Ball rather than the Dyson Sphere.

Indeed. Some lawyer probably informed them they couldn't trademark it.


Posted by: Populuxe | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 11:41 AM
horizontal rule
237

I like my love life like I like my Senate. No action until there's at least sixty of us.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 11:42 AM
horizontal rule
238

235: congratulations on your purity.


Posted by: Annelid Gustator | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 11:42 AM
horizontal rule
239

235 not meant as a judgement or criticism, just an instant reaction, a fact risen to self-awareness saying something only about me.


Posted by: bob mcmanus | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 11:43 AM
horizontal rule
240

238: Or your unusual speech impediment.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 11:43 AM
horizontal rule
241

238: "purity" should be "speech impediment"


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 11:43 AM
horizontal rule
242

sigh


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 11:44 AM
horizontal rule
243

I'd say it is a fairly common inpetiment.


Posted by: Annelid Gustator | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 11:45 AM
horizontal rule
244

242: In fairness, it takes some real skill to be pwned on that one.


Posted by: Di Kotimy | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 11:46 AM
horizontal rule
245

The real reason women don't make jokes -- we get embarrassed about all the pwning.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 11:46 AM
horizontal rule
246

Wow. 240 and 241 are really kind of epic. Apo, you should do the opposite of play the lottery today.


Posted by: donaquixote | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 11:46 AM
horizontal rule
247

153: I bought a Hoover and it's great. I decided that for the money I spent on a Dyson, I could buy a new Hoover every year and come out about even. So far the Hoover has behaved perfectly and only cost $70.


Posted by: LizSpigot | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 11:47 AM
horizontal rule
248

you should do the opposite of play the lottery today

Sell tickets for a drawing?


Posted by: Annelid Gustator | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 11:47 AM
horizontal rule
249

242: Only a feminist would let themselves get pwned by a woman.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 11:48 AM
horizontal rule
250

"My women" are not words that can seriously, or jokingly, pass my lips.

One hopes that the same is true of "my dogs".


Posted by: Jesus McQueen | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 11:49 AM
horizontal rule
251

249: I make sure LB gets to come first. Because I'm a feminist.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 11:53 AM
horizontal rule
252

Apo has an unusual speech inpwnimet.


Posted by: M/tch M/lls | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 11:54 AM
horizontal rule
253

250 to 251


Posted by: M/tch M/lls | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 11:55 AM
horizontal rule
254

250:An interesting equivalence, and not one that would ever pass my lips.


Posted by: bob mcmanus | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 11:57 AM
horizontal rule
255

I like my dogs like I like my cheese: by the pound.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:00 PM
horizontal rule
256

I don't know, Apo. If bob were a woman, maybe, but a man being pwned by a women with respect to another man? Doesn't sound very feminist to me.


Posted by: urple | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:01 PM
horizontal rule
257

250 is so to the point, and makes me much better. Thank ya, Jaysus.


Posted by: bob mcmanus | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:02 PM
horizontal rule
258

257:s/b "feel much better"


Posted by: bob mcmanus | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:03 PM
horizontal rule
259

A Spanish tramp's urine is something that would never pass my lips.


Posted by: dsquared | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:03 PM
horizontal rule
260

Portuguese, though...


Posted by: donaquixote | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:06 PM
horizontal rule
261

No action until there's at least sixty of us.

...most of whom are elderly lawyers.


Posted by: rob helpy-chalk | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:09 PM
horizontal rule
262

259, 260: dsquared never ceases to boast of his expertise on urine.

For example, see his post on Budweiser.


Posted by: peep | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:10 PM
horizontal rule
263

I like my love life like I like my Senate.

Two words: secret holds.


Posted by: urple | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:12 PM
horizontal rule
264

I made a snowman. IN MY MIND. (I'm not allowed in the actual outside part of the world.)


Posted by: Pauly Shore | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:17 PM
horizontal rule
265

259: If your consultant offers you urine, you may have framed the question wrong.


Posted by: M/tch M/lls | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:17 PM
horizontal rule
266

Two words: secret holds.

Two more: franking privileges.


Posted by: Annelid Gustator | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:17 PM
horizontal rule
267

I like my love life like I like my Senate.

Certain things can't happen without unanimous consent.


Posted by: urple | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:18 PM
horizontal rule
268

I like my love life like I like my Senate.

Structurally biased towards rural states.


Posted by: urple | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:21 PM
horizontal rule
269

I like my women like my cold fusion; compelling, energetic and wholly imaginary.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:22 PM
horizontal rule
270

The phrase "my women" is a moment on the lips, but a lifetime on the hips.


Posted by: dsquared | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:23 PM
horizontal rule
271

I like my love life like I like my Senate.

I wish both had a lot more women in them.


Posted by: urple | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:24 PM
horizontal rule
272

I like my love life like I like my Senate.

One session per year.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:25 PM
horizontal rule
273

Filibuster? I hardly know'er!


Posted by: M/tch M/lls | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:25 PM
horizontal rule
274

I like my love life like I like my Senate.

Full of purely procedural obstructionism.


Posted by: urple | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:26 PM
horizontal rule
275

I like my love life like I like my Senate.

Using Joe Biden to for ties.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:27 PM
horizontal rule
276

I like my love life like I like my Senate.

With lucrative consulting gigs available to ex-members.


Posted by: urple | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:29 PM
horizontal rule
277

I like my love life like I like my Senate.

99 assholes and Bernie Sanders.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:30 PM
horizontal rule
278

I like my love life like I like my Senate.

Lots of members, one big body.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:30 PM
horizontal rule
279

I like my love life like I like my Senate.

Full of cartoon turtles.


Posted by: donaquixote | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:31 PM
horizontal rule
280

Lots of members, one big body.

I heard George Washington had, like, 30 goddamn burgesses.


Posted by: Annelid Gustator | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:31 PM
horizontal rule
281

Totally mental.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:32 PM
horizontal rule
282

I like my love life like I like my Senate.

Broadcast on CSPAN.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:35 PM
horizontal rule
283

I like my love life like I like my Senate.

Covered extensively on cable tv.


Posted by: urple | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:35 PM
horizontal rule
284

dammit.


Posted by: urple | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:35 PM
horizontal rule
285

I am completely infatuated with someone who appears to feel exactly the same way. And this would be grand and lovely, were it not for a barrier of distance (trans-Atlantic) that at this point is simply not overcomeable. I'll enjoy it for now, but I'm cursing my luck, as this is the third or fourth time this has happened to me.


Posted by: First Lady of Your Choosing | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:38 PM
horizontal rule
286

Lots of talk, desultory action.


Posted by: fake accent | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:42 PM
horizontal rule
287

I 100% honestly thought until sometime last year that Freeman Dyson invented the Dyson vacuum cleaner, or at least had something to do with the technology. I thought the guy in the ads was Freeman Dyson. Of course, I am an idiot.


Posted by: Robert Halford | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:43 PM
horizontal rule
288

Oh well. But you can be long-distance if-only friends, and if travel turns out to possible, you'll have someone to visit. Wistful, but not all that bad.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:43 PM
horizontal rule
289

I like my love life like I like my Senate.

Not over until the whole country is fucked.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:46 PM
horizontal rule
290

It would be not all that bad if my dating life were such that I occasionally met someone here that I felt this way about! It can't just be the accent, can it?


Posted by: First Lady of Your Choosing | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:46 PM
horizontal rule
291

285--I like my long-distance relationships like I like my Senate: passionately divided, but still able to come together and interact constructively frequently enough to get the job done.


Posted by: urple | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:46 PM
horizontal rule
292

I like my love life like I like my Senate.

Constitutionally mandated.

Also, 285 sounds kind of hellish to me. How on earth does it keep happening?

And I still don't know who Freeman Dyson is, even given ample opportunity to google him.


Posted by: donaquixote | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:48 PM
horizontal rule
293

To the OP, OK Cupid does seem to work amazingly well, at least in the category "arranging a constant dating life" (can't vouch for separate category "someone to cook my buffalo steaks and listen attentively to pointless rants finding a life partner").

It might work even better if I didn't screen out the 85% of women who say that they are looking for a "partner in crime."


Posted by: Robert Halford | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:48 PM
horizontal rule
294

290: You're American, and the would-be lover is English? If so, yes, it's just the accent.


Posted by: peep | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:50 PM
horizontal rule
295

292: One, I have a tendency to meet people a month before they're about to move. Two, I'm around a lot of people only on short stays in my location. Three, ze internetz.


Posted by: First Lady of Your Choosing | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:50 PM
horizontal rule
296

293.2 -- Because you take your membership in the California Bar that seriously?


Posted by: peep | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:51 PM
horizontal rule
297

Four, possibly I'm avoiding commitment.


Posted by: First Lady of Your Choosing | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:51 PM
horizontal rule
298

ze internetz

Ooh la-la. He's French?


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:52 PM
horizontal rule
299

I like my love life like I like my Senate.

Universally known as the "Grand Compromise".


Posted by: urple | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:52 PM
horizontal rule
300

I'm thinking about starting a blog. Does anyone here know anything about geocities?


Posted by: Pauly Shore | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:54 PM
horizontal rule
301

I like my love life like I like my Senate.

A deliberative body with passionate extremes and a broad, powerful center.


Posted by: | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:54 PM
horizontal rule
302

And if he's French, it is also just the accent. (And a myriad of absurd gestures you'd run from any American dude trying out.)


Posted by: oudemia | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:55 PM
horizontal rule
303

Not French!


Posted by: First Lady of Your Choosing | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:57 PM
horizontal rule
304

I like my love life like I like my Senate.

In session for days at a time.


Posted by: Jesus McQueen | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 12:58 PM
horizontal rule
305

If he's Hungarian, it's not the accent, it's the goulash.


Posted by: M/tch M/lls | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 1:01 PM
horizontal rule
306

I like my love life like I like my health care reform: struck down before it can be enacted.


Posted by: fake accent | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 1:02 PM
horizontal rule
307

Has anyone linked to this yet?

Sea Captain Date is the only place for Sea Captains to connect with men and women who share a love of the ocean. With thousands of Captains already online, SeaCaptainDate.com is the destination for romance on the seven seas!

Posted by: Robert Halford | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 1:03 PM
horizontal rule
308

C and I reached 15 years of marriage this month. Not bad for a whim.


Posted by: asilon | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 1:05 PM
horizontal rule
309

297 would be my guess. It's a lot easier to give yourself heart and soul to someone who'll never be able to collect.

Not to be all bleak and unromantic, but... OK fine. I am bleak and unromantic.

Maybe yours is the exception, in which case you should figure out how to ditch your current situation and go be with him/her/them/it. Maybe the mineshaft can help. I'll throw in five dollars to make up for being Debbie Downer.


Posted by: togolosh | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 1:06 PM
horizontal rule
310

Nicely done. Buck and I are a little less than two years behind you, and I'm still bemused about where the time's gone.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 1:06 PM
horizontal rule
311

k-sky got there first, Halford.

asilon: a whim, you say? Go on. (Oh, and congratulations!)


Posted by: donaquixote | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 1:07 PM
horizontal rule
312

I heard Buck has like 30 goddamn accents.


Posted by: M/tch M/lls | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 1:09 PM
horizontal rule
313

Four, possibly I'm avoiding commitment.

I like my love life like I like my Senate: with enough procedural obstacles that it's easy for either side to avoid commitment.


Posted by: urple | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 1:10 PM
horizontal rule
314

If he's a sea captain, it's probably also just the accent.


Posted by: M/tch M/lls | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 1:11 PM
horizontal rule
315

310 to 304.


Posted by: urple | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 1:11 PM
horizontal rule
316

Well, that Kurzweil guy used corporate riches as a platform to crazy intellectual thought leadership, and so did Stephen Wolfram, so why not Freeman Dyson>?


Posted by: Cryptic ned | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 1:14 PM
horizontal rule
317

If he's from Eastern Europe, it's not the accent, it's an internet scam.


Posted by: M/tch M/lls | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 1:16 PM
horizontal rule
318

309: You're probably right. This tends to happen after having my heart severely broken - my version of the rebound, I suppose

Also, to the rest, peep was right, English. Kinda one of those hoity-toity accents, too, which generally isn't my style.


Posted by: First Lady of Your Choosing | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 1:20 PM
horizontal rule
319

I like my love life like I like my Senate.

All the parties seem the same, and there's always a whip.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 1:20 PM
horizontal rule
320

I like my love life like I like my Senate.

Fill her, bust her!


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 1:21 PM
horizontal rule
321

C and I reached 15 years of marriage this month.

I like my love life like I like my Senate: where outsiders might view it as dysfunctional, but where the individuals involved think those dysfunctions are what make it special, and wouldn't want it any other way.


Posted by: urple | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 1:24 PM
horizontal rule
322

I like my love life like I like my Senate: chockablock full of elderly egotists, backbiting, and poorly conceived legislation?


Posted by: Annelid Gustator | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 1:36 PM
horizontal rule
323

||

Oh...good. Some federal judge voids entire health care law.

||


Posted by: donaquixote | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 1:37 PM
horizontal rule
324

321: Aw.


Posted by: Sir Kraab | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 1:38 PM
horizontal rule
325

Unleash the judiciary jokes.


Posted by: donaquixote | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 1:39 PM
horizontal rule
326

What a judic bag.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 1:40 PM
horizontal rule
327

i have 2 okc first dates this week and am feeling somewhat optimistic! not about them in *particular* just, i dunno!

it's been... colorful i guess. the last guy i met, it went pretty well, we made out standing on the freezing sidewalk, arranged a 2nd date. then during the 4 days in between he hooked back up with his 22 year old sorta-ex who was on her way out of the country to study abroad. i canceled the 2nd date but he assured me that if i change my mind she will be gone for 9 whole months! lol.

my other recent okc-sponsored makeout also seemed to have potential but he went away over the holidays, came back and emailed me that he wasn't feelin it. so it goes.

i continue to invest too much. it's not like either of these guys were ALL THAT. a funny feeling is the feeling of relief/amusement/spite you get remembering someone's foibles that you forgave on the first date but now are free to criticize. e.g. he got up to pee TWICE and murmured something about a small bladder! well guess what dude, my real boyfriend will have a HUGE BLADDER.

okc has mostly been good for peppering a schedule with ok ways to spend evenings. most often i feel like neither of us has quite enough momentum to want to see the other again - so, whatever. re 293: i screen out the guys who say they are looking for a woman "equally comfortable in heels or hiking boots".


Posted by: ursyne | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 1:40 PM
horizontal rule
328

I like my love life like I like my Senate

With everyone knowing up front that I'll be choosing two at a time, each for a six-year term.


Posted by: urple | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 1:40 PM
horizontal rule
329

I like my love life like I like my Senate

Lots of pork.


Posted by: urple | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 1:42 PM
horizontal rule
330

e.g. he got up to pee TWICE and murmured something about a small bladder! well guess what dude, my real boyfriend will have a HUGE BLADDER.

Love this comment.


Posted by: will | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 1:43 PM
horizontal rule
331

330: I hate to break it to you, will, but your bladder's just not very big.


Posted by: M/tch M/lls | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 1:45 PM
horizontal rule
332

re 293: i screen out the guys who say they are looking for a woman "equally comfortable in heels or hiking boots".

Because it means they want a woman with poorly designed hiking boots?


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 1:47 PM
horizontal rule
333

my real boyfriend will have a HUGE BLADDER

Just remember, there are showers and there are growers.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 1:47 PM
horizontal rule
334

my real boyfriend will have a HUGE BLADDER

Just remember, there are showers and there are growersgolden showers.



Posted by: Annelid Gustator | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 1:48 PM
horizontal rule
335

332: yes! and half the guys say it so it seems so generic, and it smacks of trying to customize/optimize yo' woman.

equally comfortable in heels or hiking boots... IN BED.

i probably don't actually screen it out.


Posted by: ursyne | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 1:50 PM
horizontal rule
336

Actually they mean that you should be equally with them wearing either heels or hiking boots.


Posted by: rob helpy-chalk | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 1:52 PM
horizontal rule
337

327: I think I'll put "equally comfortable in heels and jackboots" in my profile.

I'm tempted to respond to women looking for a partner in crime with a serious and detailed proposal for an actual crime, but I worry that there might be legal repercussions. I bet a lot of those profiles are actually FBI sting operations.


Posted by: togolosh | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 1:53 PM
horizontal rule
338

customize/optimize yo' woman

Pimp My Ride, indeed. I'm looking for a woman who looks equally good in hiking boots and spinning gold hubcaps.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 1:54 PM
horizontal rule
339

Equally comfortable in flip-flops and sabatons.


Posted by: Sifu Tweety | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 1:55 PM
horizontal rule
340

Looking for a woman whose undercarriage is already lit.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 1:57 PM
horizontal rule
341

I'm tempted to respond to women looking for a partner in crime with a serious and detailed proposal for an actual crime

I like my love life like I like my Senate: subject to criminal laws against openly buying services in exchange for cash, but with plenty of wiggle room for mutually beneficial quid pro quo arrangements.


Posted by: urple | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 1:58 PM
horizontal rule
342

I like my love life like I like my Senate

Holdin' up all my appointments. Awwww, yeah.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 2:03 PM
horizontal rule
343

I like my love life like I like my Senate

One congress every two years?


Posted by: Ace K | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 2:08 PM
horizontal rule
344

I like my love life like I like my gun shows: no background checks, no undercover agents, and lots of cash.


Posted by: Opinionated NRA | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 2:08 PM
horizontal rule
345

I have used to like my men like I used to think I liked my cinema: serious, artistic, foreign, tragic. But actually I like pirate movies.


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 2:12 PM
horizontal rule
346

I like my love life like I like my Unfogged: from a distance, somewhat anonymous, and with occasional drunken meetups.


Posted by: will | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 2:13 PM
horizontal rule
347

334 is great, but since I don't know AG's gender, I can't draw any general conclusions.


Posted by: M/tch M/lls | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 2:13 PM
horizontal rule
348

Jackmormon:

with patches, parrots, and plunder?


Posted by: will | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 2:15 PM
horizontal rule
349

348: Ill-gotten booty.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 2:16 PM
horizontal rule
350

I disapprove of parrots...


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 2:17 PM
horizontal rule
351

Pimp my Ride, indeed


Now, you know the coils ain't even buzzin', little generator won't get the spark
Motor's in a bad condition, you gotta have these batteries charged
But I'm cryin', pleease, pleease don't do me wrong.
Who been drivin' my Terraplane now for you since I been gone.


Posted by: lw | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 2:17 PM
horizontal rule
352

since I don't know AG's gender

I'm all man, laydeez.


Posted by: OPINIONATED ERIC HOLDER | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 2:21 PM
horizontal rule
353

352: But how big is your bladder?


Posted by: M/tch M/lls | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 2:34 PM
horizontal rule
354

353: M/tch is interested in the subpoenas.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 2:59 PM
horizontal rule
355

When I was a kid my grandfather called my sister and me "meeskeit" which is Yiddish for "ugliness." I later found out this was because it is a common Jewish superstition that if you talk about good things, they get taken away.* So, my dating life? It's nothing special.

*It's possible we were also hideous.


Posted by: Mister Smearcase | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 3:10 PM
horizontal rule
356

354: That would be the scrotum, Stanley.


Posted by: Jesus McQueen | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 3:11 PM
horizontal rule
357

Scrotum? Damn near bankrupted him!


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 3:14 PM
horizontal rule
358

Homosexual? I hardly know you all!


Posted by: Mister Smearcase | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 3:24 PM
horizontal rule
359

297: I hear ya. Having a history of falling long-distance in love, and then having a miserable marriage once we were in the same location, I have worried that I'm not cut out for relationships that involve being in the same place at the same time. (I'm pretty sure that this time is different...)


Posted by: Di Kotimy | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 4:05 PM
horizontal rule
360

I'm all man, laydeez.

Pay no mind to these miscreants, Mr. Attorney General. Now, I was thinking we could talk to Mr. Boehner about that tort reform...


Posted by: Turgid Jacoby & Meyers | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 4:16 PM
horizontal rule
361

||

323:Very Good Indeed, say the Firedoglake commenters, who obviously are just evil people who want the most vulnerable to suffer and die

|>


Posted by: bob mcmanus | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 4:28 PM
horizontal rule
362

358 is the first time I have laughed out loud on a variation of that in a long time. (Not that 357 isn't smile-worthy.)


Posted by: k-sky | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 4:33 PM
horizontal rule
363

323: I think that part I'm most dreading is when Republicans use the Supreme Court overturning the law as justification for a giant, public "TOLD YOU SO!", despite the fact that this was the fucking Republican plan. (And I don't doubt that this fact will evade the attention of most major media reporting on their celebration.)


Posted by: urple | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 4:38 PM
horizontal rule
364

I like my love life like I like my Senate

Roman-inspired.


Posted by: k-sky | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 4:41 PM
horizontal rule
365

364: sexist.


Posted by: urple | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 4:43 PM
horizontal rule
366

364: that's how Stanley is too, from my understanding.


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 4:46 PM
horizontal rule
367

363:Well, maybe Obama and the Democrats should not have passed a fucking Republican plan in the first place.

Anybody who wants can read the comments at FDL in the link at 361. Most of the old arguments are repeated once again, on both sides.

I find it very disheartening that I don't trust anyone, especially the usual suspects, to give an objective assessment of this bill's constitutionality. The argument made by Vinson was that, analogy, we don't force people without cars or driving licenses to buy private car insurance. The fact that a twenty-something might need healthcare (and the probabilities are fairly low) did not justify the mandate.

I also find it dispiriting that Democrats were not able to sell, or probably did not want to sell, a common good financed out of general revenue, which would not be in question as to constitutionality.


Posted by: bob mcmanus | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 4:47 PM
horizontal rule
368

366: I don't get it.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 4:56 PM
horizontal rule
369

who obviously are just evil people who want the most vulnerable to suffer and die

Given the kind of racism and deranged dislike of Obama on display by FDL commenters these days, I don't expect they care much who dies so long as this adminstration gets a black eye. And I'm sure Hamsher's pal Grover Norquist is delighted with this turn of events, too.

Maybe Jane can run on her opposition to the ACA when she tries to primary Obama next year.


Posted by: Populuxe | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 5:17 PM
horizontal rule
370

369.2:Not gonna even be attempted, Immelt and Daley ensure Obama will have more money than God

369.1 is contemptible


Posted by: bob mcmanus | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 5:22 PM
horizontal rule
371

#370. You're damn right it's contemptible, but Jane's gotta pay the bills somehow. Give a lady a break. Fox News isn't gonna call if you spend your time defending this administration.


Posted by: Populuxe | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 5:35 PM
horizontal rule
372

HOW MANY DIVISIONS HAS JANE HAMSHER?


Posted by: OPINIONATED BARACK OBAMA IN A FIREBAGGER'S FEVERISH IMAGINATION | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 5:39 PM
horizontal rule
373

372:Exactly.

Obama, thanks to Daley, Immelt and all his other Wall Street and corporate friends, is going to have more than a billion dollars to pass around the country to party hacks and media...and Populuxe is deeply offended by Jane Hamsher's "corruption."


Posted by: bob mcmanus | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 5:45 PM
horizontal rule
374

You forgot the Jews, Bob. And you forgot all the money that Soros and his ring of international bankers are paying for an army of Obots to keep America under Obama's iron thumb of health care. You and Hamsher may have foiled us this time, but we'll be back!


Posted by: Populuxe | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 5:58 PM
horizontal rule
375

I once forgot about Dre, but there was a whole song to remind me.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 6:17 PM
horizontal rule
376

366: Because you fuck horses, dear. Or so we're led to believe.


Posted by: Thorn | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 6:19 PM
horizontal rule
377

I'm having pronoun-antecedent trouble with 374. Does the "us" include Populuxe among Jews, international bankers in Soros's ring, Obots or all of the above?


Posted by: k-sky | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 6:32 PM
horizontal rule
378

377: Seriously, k-sky, why choose? The various 'baggers don't, I'm sure!


Posted by: oudemia | Link to this comment | 01-31-11 6:36 PM
horizontal rule
379

292: And I still don't know who Freeman Dyson is, even given ample opportunity to google him.

I think the best description is "British mad genius scientist, polymath, designer of atom bombs, spaceships and atom bomb-powered spaceships, fl. 1940-2000".


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 2:12 AM
horizontal rule
380

"British mad genius scientist, polymath, designer of atom bombs, spaceships and atom bomb-powered spaceships, fl. 1940-2000".

The sort of man who was a hero to the adolescent Larry Niven.


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 2:16 AM
horizontal rule
381

"fl. 1940-2000" means? It isn't his lifespan, since he's still alive...


Posted by: Annelid Gustator | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 5:36 AM
horizontal rule
382

re: 381

Well, 'fl.' is normally used to refer the period a person is producing work [Latin, 'floruit']. I don't know why 2000 chosen as the end date, though, although I suppose he's not really producing much now.


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 5:40 AM
horizontal rule
383

Ah, I'd never actually seen that. And come on, Freeman Dyson has totes been producing: he writes global climate change denying book reviews and whatnot.


Posted by: Annelid Gustator | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 6:09 AM
horizontal rule
384

It's used a lot in history. Sometimes you've no idea when, say, a scientific instrument maker was born, or died, but you know that all the things he made were produced between 1645 and 1680, so, he's 'Johannes Von Foo, fl. 1645-1680'.


Posted by: nattarGcM ttaM | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 6:23 AM
horizontal rule
385

I've always been fond of the I'm-throwing-up-my-scholarly-hands "fl. ca. ..."


Posted by: Flippanter | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 6:30 AM
horizontal rule
386

380: "The sort of man who was a hero to the adolescent Larry Niven" - and to the arguably still adolescent ajay, for that matter.

383: does he? oh, dammit. Perhaps we need another abbreviation to go with "fl.". "Dis.", maybe, for "disseruit" - "went to seed".
So you could have James Watson, born 1928, fl. 1950-94, dis. 2000.

(As in "dissertation?")


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 8:47 AM
horizontal rule
387

386: not really "denying"; he just thinks its no big deal.


Posted by: Annelid Gustator | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 8:55 AM
horizontal rule
388

Well, maybe a little denialist...


Posted by: | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 8:56 AM
horizontal rule
389

And come on, Freeman Dyson has totes been producing: he writes global climate change denying book reviews and whatnot.

Not exactly "denying", but saying it's not a big deal, we will adapt, we will make MAGICAL CARBON-DEVOURING TREES, etc.

It's no wonder he gets away with this shit, since most of his younger colleagues at the Insti/tute don't seem to think climate change is anything to worry about either. I'll yell at them about it, but not him, because he's a tiny frail-looking old man.


Posted by: essear | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 9:26 AM
horizontal rule
390

Whoa, I totally missed 387 right there in front of me.


Posted by: essear | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 9:26 AM
horizontal rule
391

MAGICAL CARBON-DEVOURING TREES

I've been burying the propane tanks from my neighbors' grills. Every bit helps.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 9:29 AM
horizontal rule
392

367: I tried to ignore this, but throwing sanity, discretion and my pants to the wind let me comment on a couple of your points.

I find it very disheartening that I don't trust anyone, especially the usual suspects, to give an objective assessment of this bill's constitutionality.

I'd find that disheartening too, but it ain't that hard if you stay away from idiocy like the comments in that FDL thread. Here's a nice summary of key constitutional points at Balkinization (with links to the Law Review article from whence they came).

The argument made by Vinson was that, analogy, we don't force people without cars or driving licenses to buy private car insurance. The fact that a twenty-something might need healthcare (and the probabilities are fairly low) did not justify the mandate.

And what a fatuous analogy it is--if we've got to go there, more like not making "good" drivers purchase car insurance.

And if you want to look a bit deeper into Vinson's even-handed judiciousness there is:

1) His invocation of that new chestnut of humbugs in the judiciary, the unique situation dodge*: ...but non-severability is required based on the unique facts of this case and the particular aspects of the Act. This is not a situation that is likely to be repeated. *(See Bush v. Gore, of course)

2) Also a favorite of hacks like Scalia and Roberts, the oh-so-clever gratuitous soundbite for wingnuttia: It is difficult to imagine, that a nation which began, at least in part, as the result of opposition to a British mandate giving the East India Company a monopoly and imposing a nominal tax on all tea sold in America would have set out to create a government with the power to force people to buy tea in the first place.

Oh, snap!


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 9:42 AM
horizontal rule
393

It is difficult to imagine, that a nation which began, at least in part, as the result of opposition to a British mandate giving the East India Company a monopoly and imposing a nominal tax on all tea sold in America would have set out to create a government with the power to force people to buy tea in the first place.

Why is that difficult to imagine? Is there something about "no taxation without representation" that Vinson finds difficult to understand?


Posted by: urple | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 9:54 AM
horizontal rule
394

393: But ... but, they jammed it down our throats.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 10:01 AM
horizontal rule
395

393: Even the wingnuts surely don't believe that the British government tried to force Americans to buy tea, do they?


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 10:07 AM
horizontal rule
396

394 referring to the ACA.


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 10:09 AM
horizontal rule
397

saying it's not a big deal, we will adapt, we will make MAGICAL CARBON-DEVOURING TREES, etc.

Key quote: "If one quarter of the world's forests were replanted with carbon-eating varieties of the same species, the forests would be preserved as ecological resources and as habitats for wildlife, and the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere would be reduced by half in about fifty years."

http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2008/jun/12/the-question-of-global-warming/?page=2

Which is a bit "oh dear me", to be honest. You can't just clearcut the entire Amazon, replant it with GM carbon-eating trees, and expect all the rest of the ecosystem to spring back...


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 10:13 AM
horizontal rule
398

It is difficult to imagine, that a nation which began, at least in part, as the result of opposition to British colonial rule and in armed conflict with British military forces would have set out to create a government with the power to assemble a traditional armed military of its own.


Posted by: urple | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 10:16 AM
horizontal rule
399

It is difficult to imagine...would have set out to create a government with the power to force people to buy tea in the first place.

I suspect it isn't worthwhile to try to talk to people who can't follow that sentence.

No, he was not saying the British forced us to buy tea.

Maybe it is just dishonesty and lack of integrity, which used to be only the practice of Republicans, but since the election of Obama, has become universal.


Posted by: bob mcmanus | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 10:18 AM
horizontal rule
400

And Chappaquiddick.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 10:20 AM
horizontal rule
401

which used to be only the practice of Republicans

Indeed, prior to 2009, the entire Democratic Party operated with nothing but honesty and integrity.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 10:22 AM
horizontal rule
402

398: well, they didn't, of course, hence that line in the Constitution about how you're not allowed to appropriate more than two years' worth of your army budget at once.

It is difficult to imagine, that a nation which began, at least in part, as the result of armed resistance to a policy designed to stop drug smugglers would have set out to create a government with the power to create an anti-drug smuggling force of its own.

(Yes, tea is a drug. Part of the reason for colonial opposition to the Townshend taxes was that they would make legal tea much cheaper for ordinary Americans to buy, and would thus - intentionally - put hardworking American tea smugglers out of business.)


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 10:25 AM
horizontal rule
403

I've just reread 399 and realised that I have just been personally scorned by bob. O great wonder and gladness! For now all my dreams have come true!


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 10:27 AM
horizontal rule
404

399: Fuck off.


Posted by: Cryptic ned | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 10:29 AM
horizontal rule
405

397: Wow. Why stop there? If a quarter of the world's fuel-burning devices were replaced with...if a quarter of the world's cities were replaced with...easy-peasy!


Posted by: Jesus McQueen | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 10:30 AM
horizontal rule
406

Before the election of Obama, I used to spend much less time commenting on the internet.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 10:31 AM
horizontal rule
407

Not that there is a causal relationship there.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 10:33 AM
horizontal rule
408

Daa-aad! I need help with my homework!


Posted by: Pauly Shore | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 10:41 AM
horizontal rule
409

405: well, yes. I think the huge giant sunshade would be several orders of magnitude easier and more likely to work.
All you need to cut insolation by 1% is of the order of 1m square kilometres of sunshade; that's only 100,000 tonnes of material into orbit. Five hundred launches of a heavy-lift rocket, or half a million rounds from a Babylon Gun. Less, if you found lighter materials. Piece of cake.


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 10:41 AM
horizontal rule
410

Indeed, prior to 2009, the entire Democratic Party operated with nothing but honesty and integrity.

Not just the Democratic Party, Apo. The entire non-Republican population, universally.


Posted by: urple | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 10:43 AM
horizontal rule
411

409: Done.


Posted by: Jesus McQueen | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 10:50 AM
horizontal rule
412

409: I don't really care what the problem is as long as the solution is "build a Babylon Gun."


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 10:51 AM
horizontal rule
413

Oooh, ooh, post-fodder suggestion: Give Away More Money, Damnit, and Don't Whine. Discussed a bit here, though I feel like I wrote my comments through a fog of ... fogginess.


Posted by: x.trapnel | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 11:14 AM
horizontal rule
414

You can't just clearcut the entire Amazon, replant it with GM carbon-eating trees

WHY THE HELL NOT?


Posted by: OPINIONATED UAW MEMBER | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 11:26 AM
horizontal rule
415

I'm actually a little disturbed at the direction the troll control measures are taking these last couple of days. Making someone a figure of fun is one thing, but... these last several are kind of gross.


Posted by: Annelid Gustator | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 11:41 AM
horizontal rule
416

kind of gross

Welcome to the internet, AG.


Posted by: apostropher | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 11:47 AM
horizontal rule
417

I prefer to troll using vinyl. Digital trolling doesn't have the right sound.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 11:57 AM
horizontal rule
418

366: I don't get it.

There's a horse in it.


Posted by: nosflow | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 12:04 PM
horizontal rule
419

413: I find myself wondering about how he plans to pay for retirement, but maybe that's just a very US-centric concern.


Posted by: essear | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 12:07 PM
horizontal rule
420

417: Analogue trolling from vinyl just has that warmth to it, ya know?


Posted by: Annelid Gustator | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 12:10 PM
horizontal rule
421

418: I preferred 376 (even with its curious numbering), but thanks. I guess.


Posted by: Stanley | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 12:14 PM
horizontal rule
422

There's a horse in it outside


Posted by: k-sky | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 12:21 PM
horizontal rule
423

There's a horse in it outsidethe hospital.


Posted by: Annelid Gustator | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 12:33 PM
horizontal rule
424

Give Away More Money, Damnit, and Don't Whine. Discussed a bit here, though I feel like I wrote my comments through a fog of ... fogginess.

I found the discussion more interesting than the original article despite (or because of) the fogginess.

I think there are a number of elements of the question that are messier than Ord makes them out to be, but I think you're also correct to say that the challenge that he makes is, "can you make a commitment to action, at some level, while continuing to debate the messy parts as you desire?"


Posted by: NickS | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 12:35 PM
horizontal rule
425

Give Away More Money, Damnit, and Don't Whine.

I got involved with some fundraising stuff at church recently, and was pretty amazed at how many folks, rich and not-rich, really do seem to "tithe" by giving away 10% of their income to charity (not just the church). I mean, it's not like I have forensic accountants checking up and it's possible that everyone is lying, but a lot of people really do seem to do this.

Personally, I'm not even remotely close to that level -- I don't think I come anywhere close to 5%, even including political donations.


Posted by: Robert Halford | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 12:43 PM
horizontal rule
426

My immediate reaction, inspired by your discussion with phoebe, would be something along the lines of the following.

1) How we spend/distribute money is learned behavior. Talking about ideal behavior based on first principles is interesting as a rhetorical/logical exercise but doesn't describe how people behave.

2) People generally work from a constrained set of choices (do I buy X or Y or nothing vs do I buy something from A to ZZ or nothing), and this is a pretty fundamental part of how people make decisions.

2a) My own personal experience with money is that I start with some universe of "pre-approved" spending possibilities that I've considered sufficiently that, when those possibilities come up, I know that I am comfortable spending money on those items as a general category and that I need only ask, "do I want this now?" rather than "is this the sort of thing I want to spending money on at all?" (take "lunch" or "CDs" as examples of things that fall into that category).

Outside of that category I spend a while on "is this the sort of thing I want to spending money on at all?" even if the amount of money is small (for example I recently bought a new pair of dress socks and I only did that because I had a pressing need. Absent a pressing need my default is just to not spend money on dress socks, and I don't even get to the point of weighing cost/utility/value.

2b) For me it takes effort to add new categories of goods into the category of things I'm comfortable spending money on (this is one of the reasons I don't travel much. I end up overthinking all the travel expenses).

2c) For me charitable giving largely falls outside of the "pre-approved" spending category.

I think this reflects badly on me, and that I'd be a better person if I made the effort to think of charitable giving as one of the standard categories of ways to use money.

2d) However, my typical mental heuristics for deciding, "yes this is an approved category" don't work well for charity because the way I normally do that it, "make a couple of purchases as an experiment and then see how I feel about it." That works great for many things ("wow, spending money on bike stuff is worth it" or "I don't regret spending money on my computer, but it doesn't seem to offer as much value as the bike stuff did."). It's harder to get feedback from charitable giving to close that feedback look of "experiment" --< "examine.

I'm not making an argument for or against this, just trying to think through my own personal mental process. But I suspect that I'm not the only person who runs into that hurdle.


Posted by: NickS | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 12:48 PM
horizontal rule
427

was pretty amazed at how many folks, rich and not-rich, really do seem to "tithe" by giving away 10% of their income to charity

Following up on 426, one of the other useful ways to arrive at, "this is a good thing to spend money on" is a sense that everybody does it.


Posted by: NickS | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 12:49 PM
horizontal rule
428

NickS gets the general model exactly right. I for example can spend $2 on coffee quite regularly but would rather walk 15 blocks than pay a $1.75 ATM fee.


Posted by: Jackmormon | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 1:10 PM
horizontal rule
429

411. I want the ring upgrade!


Posted by: md 20/400 | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 2:02 PM
horizontal rule
430

426-8: Yeah, I agree that making charity a serious part of one's budget means somehow reworking the kind of thing it's taken to be. Which is part of what I like about Ord's approach--he seems to get this, and the idea of a public commitment to >=10% seems solid, because a) nice round # and b) the Mormons do it.

Incidentally, I think Sausagely would be a good guy to promote this stuff, since he's already signed on as being on board with the basic commitments, and I think he's better at PR than Ord. If any regulars are still tight with him, you should totally suggest he do this. Much better than his "I'm going to give $100 to a poor person today" pledge.


Posted by: x.trapnel | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 2:37 PM
horizontal rule
431

Yeah, I agree that making charity a serious part of one's budget means somehow reworking the kind of thing it's taken to be. Which is part of what I like about Ord's approach--he seems to get this, and the idea of a public commitment to >=10% seems solid, because a) nice round # and b) the Mormons do it.

I think that the second sentence isn't a satisfying response to the problem posed in the first sentence (what kind of thing is charity?).

I say this in part because when I wrote my comment I was thinking about your observation in the linked thread:

1. I'll concede that insofar as you're a demographic that should be winnable for Ord--securely UMC in expected-life-chances, aware of the problems, not yet accustomed to living richly--the fact that his pitch failed so badly with you is, itself, a sign he needs to work on it.

I see that as an important idea to follow up on -- for selfish reasons if nothing else since that seems to be my personal stumbling block as well.


Posted by: NickS | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 2:58 PM
horizontal rule
432

Well, okay. I don't mean he's hit upon anything particularly game-changing. But two key aspects are publicity and concreteness, and his pledge idea has that going for it. The goal is to get it so people think of their net income as minus not only taxes but also 'tithing'; I'd be interested in seeing research on what makes different religions (or different Mormon congregations), for example, more successful at raising compliance rates.


Posted by: x.trapnel | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 3:03 PM
horizontal rule
433

426 2d) However, my typical mental heuristics for deciding, "yes this is an approved category" don't work well for charity because the way I normally do that it, "make a couple of purchases as an experiment and then see how I feel about it." That works great for many things ("wow, spending money on bike stuff is worth it" or "I don't regret spending money on my computer, but it doesn't seem to offer as much value as the bike stuff did."). It's harder to get feedback from charitable giving to close that feedback look of "experiment" --

I think this is a good point. When one gives to charity, the money just sort of disappears and then don't hear anything about it -- or maybe you start getting lots of newsletters and junk mail and requests for more money. So there's no reward to reinforce the behavior.

I've started donating modest monthly amounts to a few charities, and don't really notice the money being gone, so probably should start adding more charities to the list or increasing the amounts.


Posted by: essear | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 3:10 PM
horizontal rule
434

I've started donating modest monthly amounts to a few charities, and don't really notice the money being gone, so probably should start adding more charities to the list or increasing the amounts.

Wouldn't it be more efficient just to request a salary reduction instead? If your were paid less, that would increase your company's profitability, which would increase the returns to shareholders, which through the magic of trickle-down economics and rising tides will make the poor better off. And that way there wouldn't be any administrative expenses from the charity getting in the way--the full extent of your salary reduction would be available to help the needy.


Posted by: urple | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 3:19 PM
horizontal rule
435

maybe you start getting lots of newsletters and junk mail and requests for more money. So there's no reward to reinforce the behavior.

You know, I hadn't ever thought of it that way, but I perceive the charity-related junk mail as a penalty for donating -- I feel guilty every time I see something, and I end up kind of hating the charity, so I stop giving them money. This is really, really stupid, isn't it.

I should start giving money only online, and withholding my paper address. Spam doesn't make me feel guilty the way paper does.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 3:24 PM
horizontal rule
436

434: Now you're just messing with us.


Posted by: LizardBreath | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 3:24 PM
horizontal rule
437

436: Why do you hate job creation?


Posted by: JP Stormcrow | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 3:28 PM
horizontal rule
438

434: Suddenly I feel much better about the hefty pay cut I might be (semi-voluntarily) taking next year.


Posted by: essear | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 3:30 PM
horizontal rule
439

438: right. My salary was basically cut in half last year, but I treat the pay cut as a charitable contribution for tax purposes, which helps.


Posted by: urple | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 3:32 PM
horizontal rule
440

This thread has led me to discover that although my household gives little to charity, we do manage to spend 120% of our income.

I should probably get a job.


Posted by: President Fillmore | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 3:42 PM
horizontal rule
441

413 and following: My first impulse on seeing the Phoebe blog invoked was to be dismissive, I'm afraid. Trapnel does a good job interrogating her, and y'all are grand to take her point about what it takes to convince self-involved people that helping others is not only morally desirable but economically advantageous seriously.

The Slow Food movement went through a PR thought process like this, as I recall, and decided that it had to make slow food cool before it had any chance of making inroads with the UMC.

430.2 has a point, much as it pains me to say it.


Posted by: parsimon | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 6:40 PM
horizontal rule
442

What is it about that Phoebe blog that is so annoying? I can never quite put my finger on it.

Also, why is Trapnel wasting his time there instead of eating sausages, pursuing German women, and writing nonsense to justify stealing from creative people?


Posted by: Robert Halford | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 6:53 PM
horizontal rule
443

What is it about that Phoebe blog that is so annoying?

Based on that post and comments she comes across as having an incredible sense of entitlement.

But she doesn't come across as dumb, and that's something.


Posted by: NickS | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 7:01 PM
horizontal rule
444

442: What is it about that Phoebe blog that is so annoying? I can never quite put my finger on it.

Do you read it often enough to have tried to put your finger on it?

443: But she doesn't come across as dumb

Erm. Well, it takes her a while to figure out what her point might be, how's that? I get the idea that if she's not pressed, she'd be content to be somewhat flip, and let that pass for intelligent thought. Not to be too mean.

Is she the one who wrote the post complaining about Michelle Obama dressing her kids in J.Crew or whatever? I'm not sure. I've only read Phoebe one other time, when she was linked here, and I'm thinking that was the post.


Posted by: parsimon | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 7:10 PM
horizontal rule
445

442: writing nonsense to justify stealing from creative people

By the way, Halford, I don't know if you saw that there was a Holbo post on Crooked Timber recently on intellectual property, touching on some of the same issues that came up here.


Posted by: parsimon | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 7:17 PM
horizontal rule
446

Further to 445: I should add that I didn't read the thread, so for all I know you commented in it.


Posted by: parsimon | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 7:18 PM
horizontal rule
447

Erm. Well, it takes her a while to figure out what her point might be, how's that? I get the idea that if she's not pressed, she'd be content to be somewhat flip, and let that pass for intelligent thought. Not to be too mean.

A UChicago alum who's not intellectual? That can't be!


Posted by: essear | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 7:55 PM
horizontal rule
448

447: I don't get it. She's a UChicago alum? Okay.

Hey, it turns out that Crooked Timber thread isn't half bad. The conceptual apparatus involved in IP theory remains new to me (alienability, for example), but it's interesting. I should probably read the thread forward rather than backward, however.


Posted by: parsimon | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 8:13 PM
horizontal rule
449

435: I have thought of calling the organizations I give to and pleading not to be sent paper mail. Every time I see it I think "why did you spend my money on this instead of actually doing stuff?"


Posted by: Mister Smearcase | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 8:21 PM
horizontal rule
450

My cousin does a yearly fundraiser for people in his profession with AIDS and HIV, and I thought I was being great by kicking in $50 each year. Jammies' cousin is being basically conned by Campus Crusaders for Christ, and was hitting up her family for money, and Jammies let me know that he felt obligated to contribute, since she was in a fix.

Months later, I happened to ask Jammies how much we'd donated to CCC, and I was totally horrified that we donated $100. The lesson is that Jammies and I operate on wildly different increments of money. Next year, though, the AIDS folks are definitely getting $101.


Posted by: heebie-geebie | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 8:22 PM
horizontal rule
451

Well, I kind of suspect that the only reason her blog has any substantial readership is that it arose during a time when a lot of U of C undergrads who were at least loosely socially connected to each other were blogging. I remember her blog being advertised, or linked to a lot, or something, by the Crescat collective back when they were fairly popular.


Posted by: essear | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 8:22 PM
horizontal rule
452

451 to 447.


Posted by: essear | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 8:22 PM
horizontal rule
453

Next year, though, the AIDS folks are definitely getting $101.

That should fix that virus.


Posted by: Moby Hick | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 8:24 PM
horizontal rule
454

451: Ah. Got it. I guess that explains a few things.


Posted by: parsimon | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 8:25 PM
horizontal rule
455

Those were the days. I always wondered if "Assprat Pretentia" was written by anyone I knew.


Posted by: essear | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 8:26 PM
horizontal rule
456

455: Great name. I have no idea of any of it, though. Never heard of the Crescat collective.


Posted by: parsimon | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 8:34 PM
horizontal rule
457

To 445, I have some thoughts, but life is too short to comment on Crooked Timber threads, and, while I'm sure JH is a good guy who I'd likely agree with 98% of the time, there is something about his internet writing style that drives me crazy and makes me think unpleasant thoughts, so I am studiously avoiding caring about that post.


Posted by: Robert Halford | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 8:47 PM
horizontal rule
458

I was kinda hoping that everyone involved in Crescat Sententia would have been executed by a benevolent dictator by now, but life is full of disappointment.

Aggh, what is wrong with me. I am not a crank who hates everyone! Must learn to live without contempt.


Posted by: Robert Halford | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 8:50 PM
horizontal rule
459

457: Understood.


Posted by: parsimon | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 8:52 PM
horizontal rule
460

458.1 is vastly amusing.


Posted by: Josh | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 8:56 PM
horizontal rule
461

I was unfamiliar with both Crescat Sententia and Assprat Pretentia, but am fairly certain that I know the author of the latter. Huh.


Posted by: Gabardine Bathyscaphe | Link to this comment | 02- 1-11 9:00 PM
horizontal rule
462

Jeez, Halford, I didn't realize I'd touched such a nerve.


Posted by: x.trapnel | Link to this comment | 02- 2-11 1:16 AM
horizontal rule
463

I have some thoughts, but life is too short to comment on Crooked Timber threads

I think of Crooked Timber as being like Unfogged in a business suit. Or Unfogged is CT in an open necked shirt. Not sure which.


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 02- 2-11 1:19 AM
horizontal rule
464

I always thought of Unfogged as CT in assless chaps.


Posted by: x.trapnel | Link to this comment | 02- 2-11 1:23 AM
horizontal rule
465

464. Yeah, that too.


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 02- 2-11 1:27 AM
horizontal rule
466

OTOH the main assless chap hasn't been around for a while.


Posted by: chris y | Link to this comment | 02- 2-11 1:28 AM
horizontal rule
467

462 to 458.1, btw.


Posted by: x.trapnel | Link to this comment | 02- 2-11 1:34 AM
horizontal rule
468

OTOH the main assless chap hasn't been around for a while.

Yes, maybe these days just CT in a clown suit.


Posted by: x.trapnel | Link to this comment | 02- 2-11 1:35 AM
horizontal rule
469

I don't really care what the problem is as long as the solution is "build a Babylon Gun."

Unfortunately, the only problem that has historically been solved by building a Babylon Gun is the problem: "I am breathing too regularly and have not yet met any employees of the Mossad's wetwork division".


Posted by: ajay | Link to this comment | 02- 2-11 1:45 AM
horizontal rule
470

Dating always has problems, relationships are about problems and sorting them out.


Posted by: Dating dilema | Link to this comment | 10- 3-12 12:17 PM
horizontal rule